Evaluating the dosimetric consequences of MLC leaf positioning errors in dynamic IMRT treatments. Issue 3 (12th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Agarwal, Arpita; Rastogi, Nikhil; Maria Das, KJ; Yoganathan, SA; Udayakumar, D; Naresh, R; Kumar, Shaleen
• Is Part Of: Journal of radiotherapy in practice. Volume 18:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 225
• Page End: 231
• Publication Date: 2019-02-12
• Subjects: IMRT, -- MLC, -- random, -- systematic, -- uncertainties; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; 615.842005
• DOI: 10.1017/S1460396918000705
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1460-3969

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) positional errors on dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatments through planning simulation. Secondly the sensitivity of IMRT MatriXX device for detecting the MLC leaf positional errors was also evaluated. Materials and methods: In this study five dynamic IMRT plans, each for brain and head–neck (HN), were retrospectively included. An in-house software was used to introduce random errors (uniform distribution between −2·0 and +2·0 mm) and systematic errors [±0·5, ±0·75, ±1·0 and ±2·0 mm (+: open MLC error and −: close MLC error)]. The error-introduced MLC files were imported into the treatment planning system and new dose distributions were calculated. Furthermore, the dose–volume histogram files of all plans were exported to in-house software for equivalent uniform dose (EUD), tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability calculations. The error-introduced plans were also delivered on LINAC, and the planar fluences were measured by IMRT MatriXX. Further, 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm γ -criteria were used for analysis. Results: In planning simulation study, the impact of random errors was negligible and ΔEUD was <0·5±0·7%, for both brain and HN. The impact of systematic errors was substantial, and on average, the maximum change in EUD for systematic errors (close 2 mm) was −10·7±3·1% for brain and −15·5±2·6% for HN. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the acceptable systematic error was 0·4 mm for brain and 0·3 mm for HN. Furthermore, IMRT MatriXX device was able to detect the MLC errors ≥2 mm in HN and >3 mm errors in brain with 2%/2 mm γ -criteria.