Machine learning multivariate pattern analysis predicts classification of posttraumatic stress disorder and its dissociative subtype: a multimodal neuroimaging approach. Issue 12 (11th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nicholson, Andrew A.; Densmore, Maria; McKinnon, Margaret C.; Neufeld, Richard W.J.; Frewen, Paul A.; Théberge, Jean; Jetly, Rakesh; Richardson, J. Donald; Lanius, Ruth A.
• Is Part Of: Psychological medicine. Volume 49:Issue 12(2019)
• Page Start: 2049
• Page End: 2059
• Publication Date: 2018-10-11
• Subjects: Amygdala, -- dissociative subtype, -- fMRI, -- machine learning, -- PTSD, -- resting-state; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Medicine and psychology -- Periodicals; Clinical psychology -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718002866
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-2917

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The field of psychiatry would benefit significantly from developing objective biomarkers that could facilitate the early identification of heterogeneous subtypes of illness. Critically, although machine learning pattern recognition methods have been applied recently to predict many psychiatric disorders, these techniques have not been utilized to predict subtypes of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including the dissociative subtype of PTSD (PTSD + DS). Methods: Using Multiclass Gaussian Process Classification within PRoNTo, we examined the classification accuracy of: (i) the mean amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (mALFF; reflecting spontaneous neural activity during rest); and (ii) seed-based amygdala complex functional connectivity within 181 participants [PTSD ( n = 81); PTSD + DS ( n = 49); and age-matched healthy trauma-unexposed controls ( n = 51)]. We also computed mass-univariate analyses in order to observe regional group differences [false-discovery-rate (FDR)-cluster corrected p < 0.05, k = 20]. Results: We found that extracted features could predict accurately the classification of PTSD, PTSD + DS, and healthy controls, using both resting-state mALFF (91.63% balanced accuracy, p < 0.001) and amygdala complex connectivity maps (85.00% balanced accuracy, p < 0.001). These results were replicated using independent machine learning algorithms/cross-validation procedures. Moreover, areas weighted as being most important for group classification also displayed significant group differences at the univariate level. Here, whereas the PTSD + DS group displayed increased activation within emotion regulation regions, the PTSD group showed increased activation within the amygdala, globus pallidus, and motor/somatosensory regions. Conclusion: The current study has significant implications for advancing machine learning applications within the field of psychiatry, as well as for developing objective biomarkers indicative of diagnostic heterogeneity.