Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty: 386, 104 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. (2nd November 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty: 386, 104 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. (2nd November 2015)
- Main Title:
- Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty
- Authors:
- Steiger, Richard N de
Muratoglu, Orhun
Lorimer, Michelle
Cuthbert, Alana R
Graves, Stephen E - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background and purpose — While highly crosslinked polyethylene has shown reduced in vivo wear and lower rates of revision for total hip arthroplasty, there have been few long-term studies on its use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the rate of revision of non-crosslinked polyethylene to that of crosslinked polyethylene in patients who underwent TKA for osteoarthritis. Patients and methods — We examined data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry on 302, 214 primary TKA procedures with non-crosslinked polyethylene and 83, 890 procedures with crosslinked polyethylene, all of which were performed for osteoarthritis. The survivorship of the different polyethylenes was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared using proportional hazard models. Results — The 10-year cumulative revision rate for non-crosslinked polyethylene was 5.8% (95% CI: 5.7–6.0) and for crosslinked polyethylene it was 3.5% (95% CI: 3.2–3.8) (> 6.5-year HR = 2.2 (1.5–3.1); p < 0.001). There was no effect of surgical volume or method of prosthesis fixation on outcome. There were 4 different TKA designs that had a minimum of 2, 500 procedures in at least 1 of the polyethylene groups and a follow-up of ≥ 5 years. 2 of these, the NexGen and the Natural Knee II, had a lower rate of revision for crosslinked polyethylene. The Scorpio NRG/Series 7000 and the Triathlon Knee did not show a lower rate of revision for crosslinked polyethylene.Abstract : Background and purpose — While highly crosslinked polyethylene has shown reduced in vivo wear and lower rates of revision for total hip arthroplasty, there have been few long-term studies on its use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the rate of revision of non-crosslinked polyethylene to that of crosslinked polyethylene in patients who underwent TKA for osteoarthritis. Patients and methods — We examined data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry on 302, 214 primary TKA procedures with non-crosslinked polyethylene and 83, 890 procedures with crosslinked polyethylene, all of which were performed for osteoarthritis. The survivorship of the different polyethylenes was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared using proportional hazard models. Results — The 10-year cumulative revision rate for non-crosslinked polyethylene was 5.8% (95% CI: 5.7–6.0) and for crosslinked polyethylene it was 3.5% (95% CI: 3.2–3.8) (> 6.5-year HR = 2.2 (1.5–3.1); p < 0.001). There was no effect of surgical volume or method of prosthesis fixation on outcome. There were 4 different TKA designs that had a minimum of 2, 500 procedures in at least 1 of the polyethylene groups and a follow-up of ≥ 5 years. 2 of these, the NexGen and the Natural Knee II, had a lower rate of revision for crosslinked polyethylene. The Scorpio NRG/Series 7000 and the Triathlon Knee did not show a lower rate of revision for crosslinked polyethylene. Interpretation — There is a lower rate of revision for crosslinked polyethylene in TKA, and this appears to be prosthesis-specific and when it occurs is most evident in patients < 65 years of age. The difference in revision rates was mainly due to revisions because of lysis and loosening. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Acta orthopaedica. Volume 86:Number 6(2015)
- Journal:
- Acta orthopaedica
- Issue:
- Volume 86:Number 6(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 86, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 86
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0086-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 721
- Page End:
- 727
- Publication Date:
- 2015-11-02
- Subjects:
- Orthopedics -- Periodicals
616.7005 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/ort ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/iort20/current ↗
https://actaorthop.org/actao/index ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗
http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/app/home/journal.asp?wasp=65168817ff044fea9c5b577f1cfe2186&referrer=parent&backto=linkingpublicationresults, 1:113260, 1 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/17453674.2015.1065046 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1745-3674
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0642.055000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11389.xml