Virgin microplastics are not causing imminent harm to fish after dietary exposure. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jovanović, Boris; Gökdağ, Kerem; Güven, Olgaç; Emre, Yilmaz; Whitley, Elizabeth M.; Kideys, Ahmet Erkan
• Is Part Of: Marine pollution bulletin. Volume 130(2018)
• Page Start: 123
• Page End: 131
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Microplastics -- Marine litter -- Fish -- Histopathology -- Diet -- Toxicity; Marine pollution -- Periodicals; Marine Biology -- Periodicals; Water Pollution -- Periodicals; Mer -- Pollution -- Périodiques; Publications périodiques; Pollution des mers; Lutte antipollution; Electronic journals; 363.7394
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-326X

Abstract

Abstract: Among aquatic organisms, fish are particularly susceptible to ingesting microplastic particles due to their attractive coloration, buoyancy, and resemblance to food. However, in previous experimental setups, fish were usually exposed to unrealistically high concentrations of microplastics, or the microplastics were deliberately contaminated with persistent organic chemicals; also, in many experiments, the fish were exposed only during the larval stages. The present study investigated the effects of virgin microplastics in gilt-head seabream ( Sparus aurata ) after 45 days' exposure at 0.1 g kg −1 bodyweight day −1 to 6 common types of microplastics. The overall growth, biochemical analyses of the blood, histopathology, and the potential of the microplastics to accumulate in gastrointestinal organs or translocate to the liver and muscles were monitored and recorded. The results revealed that ingestion of virgin microplastics does not cause imminent harm to the adult gilt-head seabream during 45 days of exposure and an additional 30 days of depuration. The retention of virgin microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract was fairly low, indicating effective elimination of microplastics from the body of the fish and no significant accumulation after successive meals. Therefore, both the short- and the long-term retention potential of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of fish is close to zero. However, some large particles remained trapped in the liver, and 5.3% of all the livers analyzed contained at least one microplastic particle. In conclusion, the dietary exposure of S . aurata to 6 common types of virgin microplastics did not induce stress, alter the growth rate, cause pathology, or cause the microplastics to accumulate in the gastrointestinal tract of the fish. Highlights: Ingestion of virgin microplastics does not cause imminent harm to fish. Retention of virgin microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of fish is small. Large microplastics remained in the fish liver.