Modeling film boiling within chimney-structured porous media and heat pipes. (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yeo, D.Y.; NO, H.C.
• Is Part Of: International journal of heat and mass transfer. Volume 124(2018)
• Page Start: 576
• Page End: 585
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: Film boiling -- Porous medium -- Deposit -- Capillary pressure -- Steam chimney; Heat -- Transmission -- Periodicals; Mass transfer -- Periodicals; Chaleur -- Transmission -- Périodiques; Transfert de masse -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 621.4022
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.093
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-9310

Abstract

Highlights: Applied heat can increase capillary pressure during the film-boiling regime of the porous media. Film boiling of the chimney-structured porous media and heat pipe is analogous to the capillary limit. There is the optimum density of chimneys that maximize heat transfer through the porous medium. The chimney-structured porous medium with small pores is worse in heat removal than one with large pores. Abstract: A porous medium with separated paths for liquid and vapor flows does not fail even after part of the porous medium is dried out. Instead, a vapor film resides within the porous medium, and it grows very slowly. This heat transfer regime was named as "confined film-boiling regime" in this study, and a heat transfer model for this regime was suggested in this paper. Especially, this paper mainly focuses on heat transfer of a CRUD (Chalk River Unidentified Deposit), which is a naturally occurring porous medium found in nuclear reactors. In the present model, the balance between capillary pressure and pressure drops of liquid and vapor flows determined thickness of the vapor film. In addition, we assumed that capillary pressure was changed with applied heat flux. This assumption was validated with a planar heat pipe case: the root-mean-square-error (RMSE) was 16% for the model with the heat flux dependent capillary pressure, while one for a model with the constant capillary pressure was 790%. Furthermore, this approach also turned out to be valid for the case of the CRUD: the model predicted the wall superheat during the film boiling of the CRUD, and its relative error was only within 20% when it was compared with the measured wall superheats. Finally, sensitivity analysis for CRUD parameters found that the heat transfer performance of the CRUD is largely sensitive to chimney density and pore size.