Evaluating the commercial airliner cabin environment with different air distribution systems. (2nd July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: You, Ruoyu; Lin, Chao‐Hsin; Wei, Daniel; Chen, Qingyan
• Is Part Of: Indoor air. Volume 29:Number 5(2019)
• Page Start: 840
• Page End: 853
• Publication Date: 2019-07-02
• Subjects: computational fluid dynamics (CFD) -- displacement ventilation -- infectious disease transmission -- mixing ventilation -- personalized ventilation -- thermal comfort; Indoor air pollution -- Periodicals; Sick building syndrome -- Periodicals; Ventilation -- Periodicals; 613.5
• DOI: 10.1111/ina.12578
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-6947

Abstract

Abstract: Ventilation systems for commercial airliner cabins are important in reducing contaminant transport and maintaining thermal comfort. To evaluate the performance of a personalized displacement ventilation system, a conventional displacement ventilation system, and a mixing ventilation system, this study first used the Wells‐Riley equation integrated with CFD to obtain the SARS quanta value based on a specific SARS outbreak on a flight. This investigation then compared the three ventilation systems in a seven‐row section of a fully occupied, economy‐class cabin in Boeing 737 and Boeing 767 airplanes. The SARS quanta generation rate obtained for the index patient could be used in future studies. For all the assumed source locations, the passengers' infection risk by air in the two planes was the highest with the mixing ventilation system, while the conventional displacement ventilation system produced the lowest risk. The personalized ventilation system performed the best in maintaining cabin thermal comfort and can also reduce the infection risk. This system is recommended for airplane cabins.