Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms. (23rd August 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms. (23rd August 2018)
- Main Title:
- Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
- Authors:
- Ockleford, Colin
Adriaanse, Paulien
Berny, Philippe
Brock, Theodorus
Duquesne, Sabine
Grilli, Sandro
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
Klein, Michael
Kuhl, Thomas
Laskowski, Ryszard
Machera, Kyriaki
Pelkonen, Olavi
Pieper, Silvia
Smith, Robert H
Stemmer, Michael
Sundh, Ingvar
Tiktak, Aaldrik
Topping, Christopher J.
Wolterink, Gerrit
Cedergreen, Nina
Charles, Sandrine
Focks, Andreas
Reed, Melissa
Arena, Maria
Ippolito, Alessio
Byers, Harry
Teodorovic, Ivana - Abstract:
- Abstract: Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the 'General Unified Threshold models of Survival' (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum . For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluatedAbstract: Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the 'General Unified Threshold models of Survival' (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum . For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- EFSA journal. Volume 16:Number 8(2018)
- Journal:
- EFSA journal
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Number 8(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 8 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0016-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2018-08-23
- Subjects:
- Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models -- aquatic organisms -- prospective risk assessment -- time‐variable exposure -- model calibration -- model validation -- model evaluation
Food -- Europe -- Safety measures -- Periodicals
Food Safety
Food -- Safety measures
Europe
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Government Publications, International
Internet Resources
Periodicals
Periodicals
363.19209405 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732 ↗
- DOI:
- 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5377 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1831-4732
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 11393.xml