Repurposing Standardized Testing for Educational Equity: Can Geographical Bias and Adversity Scores Expand True College Access?. (October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: González Canché, Manuel S.
• Is Part Of: Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences. Volume 6:Number 2(2019)
• Page Start: 225
• Page End: 235
• Publication Date: 2019-10
• Subjects: bias in standardized testing -- geography of opportunity, advantage, and disadvantage -- true college access -- social, economic, and intergenerational upward mobility -- education and social equity, opportunity and stratification -- critical quantitative research -- counterfactual and potential outcomes research -- college board SAT, ACT tests -- low-income talented pool of students and human capitalization -- probabilistic matching, predictive analytics, big and geocoded data -- geographical skills college undermatch -- rigurous and equitable alternatives to experimental research; Human behavior -- Periodicals; Brain -- Periodicals; Political planning -- Periodicals; Behavioral Sciences; Public Policy; Brain; Human behavior; Political planning; Periodicals; Periodicals; 150
• DOI: 10.1177/2372732219861123
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2372-7322

Abstract

Recent Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal charges involving standardized testing have renewed public scrutiny over the tests' role in reproducing inequities and wealth-based privileges. Although some continue to call for the eradication of standardized testing, this article presents a different perspective with a threefold purpose. First it provides a critical review of the existing literature on standardized testing including the newest development: geographical bias in testing or the systemic and systematic ways in which place-based resources influence test-takers' performance. Second, it discusses the goals and consequences of the College Board's recently unveiled "adversity score, " designed as a tool to "boost admission prospects" of students facing additional challenges in their neighborhoods and schools. Finally, it offers a conceptual and methodological framework and policy insights to shift the role of these tests as reproducers of inequalities to enhancers of equity and opportunity into what is termed true college access : enrollment with realistic prospects of success.