Evaluation of the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant capacity, biomass yield and quality of tomato using aeroponics, hydroponics and porous tube-vermiculite systems in bio-regenerative life support systems. (August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Minjuan; Dong, Chen; Gao, Wanlin
• Is Part Of: Life sciences in space research. Volume 22(2019)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 75
• Publication Date: 2019-08
• Subjects: Controlled environments -- Aeroponics -- Hydroponics -- Vermiculite -- Tomato; Space biology -- Periodicals; 571.0919
• DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2019.07.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-5524

Abstract

Highlights: Tomato chlorophyll a content grown in aeroponics system had the top advantages. Both tomato photosynthesis and stomatal conductance maximized at the development stage. There were no significant differences among nutrient delivery systems in the per fruit fresh mass. Abstract: The nutrient delivery system is one of the most important hardware components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) production in Bio-regenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) for future long-term space mission. The objective of this study was to investigate the influences of different nutrient delivery systems (aeroponics, hydroponics and porous tube-vermiculite) on the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant capacity, biomass yield and quality of tomato during its life cycle. The results showed that the dry weight of aeroponics and porous tube-vermiculite treatment group was 1.95 and 1.93 g/fruit, but the value of hydroponics treatment group was only 1.56 g/fruit. Both tomato photosynthesis and stomatal conductance maximized at the development stage and then decreased later in senescent leaves. At the initial stage and the development stage, POD activities in the aeroponics treatment were higher than other two treatments, reached 3.6 U/mg prot and 4.6 U/mg prot, respectively. The fresh yield 431.3 g/plant of hydroponics treatment group was lower. At the same time, there were no significant differences among nutrient delivery systems in the per fruit fresh mass, which was 14.2–17.5 g/fruit.