"No seconds for you!": Exploring a sociocultural model of fat-talking in the presence of family involving restrictive/critical caregiver eating messages, relational body image, and anti-fat attitudes in college women. (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- "No seconds for you!": Exploring a sociocultural model of fat-talking in the presence of family involving restrictive/critical caregiver eating messages, relational body image, and anti-fat attitudes in college women. (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- "No seconds for you!": Exploring a sociocultural model of fat-talking in the presence of family involving restrictive/critical caregiver eating messages, relational body image, and anti-fat attitudes in college women
- Authors:
- Rogers, Courtney B.
Taylor, Jessica J.
Jafari, Nadia
Webb, Jennifer B. - Abstract:
- Highlights: Restrictive/critical caregiver eating messages correlated with family fat talk. Relational body image and anti-fat attitudes were mediators. External body shame was the strongest mediator. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. Abstract: In line with sociocultural models of parental influence on body image, we examined the relationship between recall of restrictive/critical caregiver eating messages (RCEM) and current frequency of disclosing self-disparaging fat talk among family in 335 undergraduate women ( M age = 19.4; SD = 1.53; range = 18–27). Additionally, two forms of relational body image (i.e., perceived body acceptance by others, external body image shame) and anti-fat attitudes were tested as potential explanatory pathways. RCEM were positively related to current frequency of self-directed fat talk in the family context. All three proposed mediators helped explain this relationship, with external body image shame demonstrating the largest observed effect. Findings suggest frequent recollections of caregivers' implied weight-stigmatizing comments surrounding eating may contribute to more frequent self-denigrating body talk with family members at present via both positive and negative dimensions of relational body image and endorsed explicit weight bias. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
- Is Part Of:
- Body image. Volume 30(2019)
- Journal:
- Body image
- Issue:
- Volume 30(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0030-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 56
- Page End:
- 63
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- Family fat talk -- Caregiver eating messages -- External body image shame -- Perceived body acceptance by others -- Weight bias
Body image -- Periodicals
Body image -- Research -- Periodicals
Body Image -- Periodicals
306.4613 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17401445 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.05.004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1740-1445
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2117.201700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11383.xml