Immediate occlusal vs nonocclusal loading of implants: A randomized prospective clinical pilot study and patient centered outcome after 36 months. (7th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vogl, Susanne; Stopper, Marlene; Hof, Markus; Theisen, Kerstin; Wegscheider, Walther A.; Lorenzoni, Martin
• Is Part Of: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. Volume 21:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 766
• Page End: 774
• Publication Date: 2019-05-07
• Subjects: bone loss -- computer‐assisted -- immediate function -- immediate loading -- marginal bone loss -- patient satisfaction -- randomized controlled trial; Dental implants -- Periodicals; Dental Implantation -- Periodicals; Dental Implants -- Periodicals; 617.693
• DOI: 10.1111/cid.12770
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1523-0899

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Immediate provisionalization reduces chair time and improves patient comfort. Purpose: To analyze immediate functional loading vs nonfunctional loading with restorations in the posterior mandible for marginal bone defects, implant success/survival, and patient satisfaction. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to assess these parameters based on 20 adult patients who underwent implant surgery, followed by immediate delivery of screw‐retained or cemented single or splinted restorations in full occlusal contact or in infraocclusion (test and control group). A questionnaire with visual analog scales was used to assess patient satisfaction. Results: Following 36‐month data were evaluable for 9 patients (21 implants) in the study group (immediate functional loading) and for 10 patients (31 implants) in the control group (immediate nonfunctional loading). One implant in the control group was lost, hence the overall implant survival and success rate was 98.2%. Marginal bone defects were consistent with previous studies and comparable in both groups. Periotest values did not significantly change from baseline and the 12‐month follow‐up (Friedmann test). Patient satisfaction was high and did not involve any significant intergroup differences (Mann‐Whitney U ‐test). Conclusions: Both types of immediate provisional restorations are viable in selected patients. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to establish immediate functional loading as a standard treatment for partially edentulous jaws.