Biofilm as a risk factor in implant treatment. Issue 1 (12th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Daubert, Diane M.; Weinstein, Bradley F.
• Editors: Romanos, Georgios E.
• Is Part Of: Periodontology 2000. Volume 81:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 29
• Page End: 40
• Publication Date: 2019-08-12
• Subjects: Periodontics -- Periodicals; 617.632
• DOI: 10.1111/prd.12280
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0906-6713

Abstract

Abstract: This article summarizes the microbiological findings at dental implants, drawing distinctions between the peri‐implant microbiome and the periodontal microbiome, and summarizes what is known regarding biofilm as a risk factor for specific stages of implant treatment. Targeted microbial analysis is reviewed as well as the latest results from open‐ended sequencing of the peri‐implant flora. At this time there remains a lack of consensus for a specific microbial profile that is associated with peri‐implantitis, suggesting that there may be other factors which influence the microbiome such as titanium surface dissolution. Therapeutic interventions to address the biofilm are presented at the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative stages. Evidence supports that perioperative chlorhexidine reduces biofilm‐related implant complications and failure. Regular maintenance for dental implants is also shown to reduce peri‐implant mucositis and implant failure. Maintenance procedures should aim to disrupt the biofilm without damaging the titanium dioxide surface layer in an effort to prevent further oxidation. Evidence supports the use of glycine powder air polishing as a valuable adjunct to conventional therapies for use at implant maintenance visits. For the treatment of peri‐implantitis, nonsurgical therapy has not been shown to be effective, and while surgical intervention is not always predictable, it has been shown to be superior to nonsurgical treatment for decontamination of the implant surface that is not covered by bone.