Study and comparison of different sensitivity models for a two-plane Compton camera. (25th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Muñoz, Enrique; Barrio, John; Bernabéu, José; Etxebeste, Ane; Lacasta, Carlos; Llosá, Gabriela; Ros, Ana; Roser, Jorge; Oliver, Josep F
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 63:Number 13(2018:Jul.)
• Publication Date: 2018-06-25
• Subjects: Compton camera imaging -- MLEM -- Monte Carlo simulations -- image quality; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac8cd
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: Given the strong variations in the sensitivity of Compton cameras for the detection of events originating from different points in the field of view (FoV), sensitivity correction is often necessary in Compton image reconstruction. Several approaches for the calculation of the sensitivity matrix have been proposed in the literature. While most of these models are easily implemented and can be useful in many cases, they usually assume high angular coverage over the scattered photon, which is not the case for our prototype. In this work, we have derived an analytical model that allows us to calculate a detailed sensitivity matrix, which has been compared to other sensitivity models in the literature. Specifically, the proposed model describes the probability of measuring a useful event in a two-plane Compton camera, including the most relevant physical processes involved. The model has been used to obtain an expression for the system and sensitivity matrices for iterative image reconstruction. These matrices have been validated taking Monte Carlo simulations as a reference. In order to study the impact of the sensitivity, images reconstructed with our sensitivity model and with other models have been compared. Images have been reconstructed from several simulated sources, including point-like sources and extended distributions of activity, and also from experimental data measured with 22 Na sources. Results show that our sensitivity model is the best suited for our prototype. Although other models in the literature perform successfully in many scenarios, they are not applicable in all the geometrical configurations of interest for our system. In general, our model allows to effectively recover the intensity of point-like sources at different positions in the FoV and to reconstruct regions of homogeneous activity with minimal variance. Moreover, it can be employed for all Compton camera configurations, including those with low angular coverage over the scatterer.