Individual differences in corticolimbic structural profiles linked to insecure attachment and coping styles in motor functional neurological disorders. (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Williams, Benjamin; Jalilianhasanpour, Rozita; Matin, Nassim; Fricchione, Gregory L.; Sepulcre, Jorge; Keshavan, Matcheri S.; LaFrance, W. Curt; Dickerson, Bradford C.; Perez, David L.
• Is Part Of: Journal of psychiatric research. Volume 102(2018)
• Page Start: 230
• Page End: 237
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: Conversion disorder -- Functional movement disorders -- Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures -- Parahippocampus -- Attachment; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Mental Disorders -- Periodicals; Maladies mentales -- Périodiques; Psychiatry; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.89005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.04.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3956

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Insecure attachment and maladaptive coping are important predisposing vulnerabilities for Functional Neurological Disorders (FND)/Conversion Disorder, yet no prior structural neuroimaging studies have investigated biomarkers associated with these risk factors in FND populations. This magnetic resonance imaging study examined cortical thickness and subcortical volumes associated with self-reported attachment and coping styles in patients with FND. We hypothesized that insecure attachment and maladaptive coping would relate to limbic-paralimbic structural alterations. Methods: FreeSurfer cortical thickness and subcortical volumetric analyses were performed in 26 patients with motor FND (21 women; 5 men) and 27 healthy controls (22 women; 5 men). For between-group comparisons, patients with FND were stratified by Relationship Scales Questionnaire, Ways of Coping Scale-Revised, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores. Within-group analyses were also performed in patients with FND. All analyses were performed in the complete cohort and separately in women only to evaluate for gender-specific effects. Cortical thickness analyses were whole-brain corrected at the cluster-wise level; subcortical analyses were Bonferroni corrected. Results: In women with FND, dismissing attachment correlated with reduced left parahippocampal cortical thickness. Confrontive coping was associated with reduced right hippocampal volume, while accepting responsibility positively correlated with right precentral gyrus cortical thickness. These findings held adjusting for anti-depressant use. All FND-related findings were within the normal range when compared to healthy women. Conclusion: These observations connect individual-differences in limbic-paralimbic and premotor structures to attachment and coping styles in FND. The relationship between parahippocampal thickness and dismissing attachment may indicate aberrant social-emotional and contextual appraisal in women with FND.