Power Dynamics in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Multiple–Case Study Analysis of Partnering Contexts, Histories, and Practices. (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Power Dynamics in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Multiple–Case Study Analysis of Partnering Contexts, Histories, and Practices. (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Power Dynamics in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Multiple–Case Study Analysis of Partnering Contexts, Histories, and Practices
- Authors:
- Wallerstein, Nina
Muhammad, Michael
Sanchez-Youngman, Shannon
Rodriguez Espinosa, Patricia
Avila, Magdalena
Baker, Elizabeth A.
Barnett, Steven
Belone, Lorenda
Golub, Maxine
Lucero, Julie
Mahdi, Ihsan
Noyes, Emma
Nguyen, Tung
Roubideaux, Yvette
Sigo, Robin
Duran, Bonnie - Other Names:
- Kegler Michelle C. guest-editor.
- Abstract:
- Community-based participatory research has a long-term commitment to principles of equity and justice with decades of research showcasing the added value of power-sharing and participatory involvement of community members for achieving health, community capacity, policy, and social justice outcomes. Missing, however, has been a clear articulation of how power operates within partnership practices and the impact of these practices on outcomes. The National Institutes of Health–funded Research for Improved Health study (2009-2013), having surveyed 200 partnerships, then conducted seven in-depth case studies to better understand which partnership practices can best build from community histories of organizing to address inequities. The diverse case studies represented multiple ethnic–racial and other marginalized populations, health issues, and urban and rural areas and regions. Cross-cutting analyses of the qualitative results focus on how oppressive and emancipatory forms of power operate within partnerships in response to oppressive conditions or emancipatory histories of advocacy within communities. The analysis of power was conducted within each of the four domains of the community-based participatory research conceptual model, starting from how contexts shape partnering processes to impact short-term intervention and research outputs, and contribute to outcomes. Similarities and differences in how partnerships leveraged and addressed their unique contexts and historiesCommunity-based participatory research has a long-term commitment to principles of equity and justice with decades of research showcasing the added value of power-sharing and participatory involvement of community members for achieving health, community capacity, policy, and social justice outcomes. Missing, however, has been a clear articulation of how power operates within partnership practices and the impact of these practices on outcomes. The National Institutes of Health–funded Research for Improved Health study (2009-2013), having surveyed 200 partnerships, then conducted seven in-depth case studies to better understand which partnership practices can best build from community histories of organizing to address inequities. The diverse case studies represented multiple ethnic–racial and other marginalized populations, health issues, and urban and rural areas and regions. Cross-cutting analyses of the qualitative results focus on how oppressive and emancipatory forms of power operate within partnerships in response to oppressive conditions or emancipatory histories of advocacy within communities. The analysis of power was conducted within each of the four domains of the community-based participatory research conceptual model, starting from how contexts shape partnering processes to impact short-term intervention and research outputs, and contribute to outcomes. Similarities and differences in how partnerships leveraged and addressed their unique contexts and histories are presented, with both structural and relational practices that intentionally addressed power relations. These results demonstrate how community members draw from their resilience and strengths to combat histories of injustice and oppression, using partnership principles and practices toward multilevel outcomes that honor community knowledge and leadership, and seek shared power, policy, and community transformation changes, thereby advancing health equity. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Health education & behavior. Volume 46:Number 1(2019)Supplement
- Journal:
- Health education & behavior
- Issue:
- Volume 46:Number 1(2019)Supplement
- Issue Display:
- Volume 46, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0046-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 19S
- Page End:
- 32S
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- community-based participatory research -- partnering -- partnership processes -- power dynamics -- power sharing
Health education -- Periodicals
Health behavior -- Periodicals
613.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://heb.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1090198119852998 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1090-1981
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11315.xml