This is an interim version of our Electronic Legal Deposit Catalogue-eJournals and eBooks while we continue to recover from a cyber-attack.
Comment on "Surface Air Relative Humidities Spuriously Exceeding 100% in CMIP5 Model Output and Their Impact on Future Projections" by K. Ruosteenoja et al. (2017). Issue 16 (24th August 2018)
Record Type:
Journal Article
Title:
Comment on "Surface Air Relative Humidities Spuriously Exceeding 100% in CMIP5 Model Output and Their Impact on Future Projections" by K. Ruosteenoja et al. (2017). Issue 16 (24th August 2018)
Main Title:
Comment on "Surface Air Relative Humidities Spuriously Exceeding 100% in CMIP5 Model Output and Their Impact on Future Projections" by K. Ruosteenoja et al. (2017)
Key Points: Ruosteenoja et al.'s (2017 ) claim that supersaturation in the surface atmosphere is unrealistic and necessarily spurious and incorrect Supersaturations are a reality that an increasing number of atmospheric models can reproduce even in the surface atmosphere Modelers should not artificially cap relative humidity at 100% when feeding climate model archives