A comparative study on stress intensity factor-based criteria for the prediction of mixed mode I-II crack propagation in concrete. (15th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dong, Wei; Wu, Zhimin; Tang, Xuchao; Zhou, Xiangming
• Is Part Of: Engineering fracture mechanics. Volume 197(2018)
• Page Start: 217
• Page End: 235
• Publication Date: 2018-06-15
• Subjects: Concrete -- Mixed mode I-II fracture -- Crack propagation criterion -- Initial fracture toughness -- Crack propagation process; Fracture mechanics -- Periodicals; Rupture, Mécanique de la -- Périodiques; Fracture mechanics; Periodicals; 620.112605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.05.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0013-7944

Abstract

Highlights: Initial toughness criterion with K II gives better results of concrete of all grades. Difference between the Criteria I and III becomes larger as concrete strength increases. K II in Criteria I and II only affects the prediction of initial cracking load. Four criteria have little effect on crack propagation trajectory. Abstract: Combined with the fictitious crack model, the stress intensity factor (SIF)-based criteria are widely adopted to determine the crack propagation of mixed mode I-II fracture in normal strength concrete. However, less research is reported on the applicability of the different SIF-based criteria when they are used to analyze the crack propagation process of concrete with different strength grades. With this objective in mind, three-point bending and four-point shear tests were conducted in this study on C20, C50 and C80 grade concrete to measure the initial fracture toughness, fracture energy, load-crack mouth opening/sliding displacement (CMOD/CMSD). Four SIF-based criteria, including two initial fracture toughness-based (with/without mode II component of SIF K II ) and two nil SIF-based (with/without K II ), were introduced to determine crack propagation and predict the P - CMOD/CMSD curves for the notched concrete beams under four-point shear loading. The results indicated that the difference between the peak loads from experiment and from the analysis based on the nil SIF criterion with K II approximately increases with the increase of the concrete strength. By contrast, the predicted peak load and P - CMOD/CMSD curves adopting the initial fracture toughness-based criterion with K II showed better agreement with experimental results for the different concrete strength. Meanwhile, in the case of the initial fracture toughness-based criteria, the predicted initial load was underestimated if the component of K II was not considered. However, the fracture mode transformed from mixed mode I-II to mode I after the crack initiation, meaning the K II component in the criterion had a less significant effect on the crack propagation process.