On the bias of estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness from test–negative studies. Issue 52 (19th December 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- On the bias of estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness from test–negative studies. Issue 52 (19th December 2017)
- Main Title:
- On the bias of estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness from test–negative studies
- Authors:
- Ainslie, Kylie E.C.
Shi, Meng
Haber, Michael
Orenstein, Walter A. - Abstract:
- Highlights: VE against symptomatic influenza may be overestimated in some cases. Exercise caution when using the TND as VE estimates may have considerable bias. Abstract: Estimates of the effectiveness of influenza vaccines are commonly obtained from a test-negative design (TND) study, where cases and controls are patients seeking care for an acute respiratory illness who test positive and negative, respectively, for influenza infection. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates from TND studies are usually interpreted as vaccine effectiveness against medically-attended influenza (MAI). However, it is also important to estimate VE against any influenza illness (symptomatic influenza (SI)) as individuals with SI are still a public health burden even if they do not seek medical care. We present a numerical method to evaluate the bias of TND-based estimates of influenza VE with respect to MAI and SI. We consider two sources of bias: (a) confounding bias due to a (possibly unobserved) covariate that is associated with both vaccination and the probability of the outcome of interest and (b) bias resulting from the effect of vaccination on the probability of seeking care. Our results indicate that (a) VE estimates may suffer from substantial confounding bias when a confounder has a different effect on the probabilities of influenza and non-influenza ARI, and (b) when vaccination reduces the probability of seeking care against influenza ARI, then estimates of VE against MAI may beHighlights: VE against symptomatic influenza may be overestimated in some cases. Exercise caution when using the TND as VE estimates may have considerable bias. Abstract: Estimates of the effectiveness of influenza vaccines are commonly obtained from a test-negative design (TND) study, where cases and controls are patients seeking care for an acute respiratory illness who test positive and negative, respectively, for influenza infection. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates from TND studies are usually interpreted as vaccine effectiveness against medically-attended influenza (MAI). However, it is also important to estimate VE against any influenza illness (symptomatic influenza (SI)) as individuals with SI are still a public health burden even if they do not seek medical care. We present a numerical method to evaluate the bias of TND-based estimates of influenza VE with respect to MAI and SI. We consider two sources of bias: (a) confounding bias due to a (possibly unobserved) covariate that is associated with both vaccination and the probability of the outcome of interest and (b) bias resulting from the effect of vaccination on the probability of seeking care. Our results indicate that (a) VE estimates may suffer from substantial confounding bias when a confounder has a different effect on the probabilities of influenza and non-influenza ARI, and (b) when vaccination reduces the probability of seeking care against influenza ARI, then estimates of VE against MAI may be unbiased while estimates of VE against SI may be have a substantial positive bias. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Vaccine. Volume 35:Issue 52(2017)
- Journal:
- Vaccine
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Issue 52(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 52 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 52
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0035-0052-0000
- Page Start:
- 7297
- Page End:
- 7301
- Publication Date:
- 2017-12-19
- Subjects:
- Influenza -- Vaccine effectiveness -- Test-negative design -- Bias
Vaccines -- Periodicals
615.372 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0264410X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/0264410X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0264410X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.107 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0264-410X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9138.628000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11289.xml