Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage: Applying Principles to Difficult Cases. Issue 4 (2nd October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Voorhoeve, Alex; Tan-Torres Edejer, Tessa; Kapiriri, Lydia; Norheim, Ole Frithjof; Snowden, James; Basenya, Olivier; Bayarsaikhan, Dorjsuren; Chentaf, Ikram; Eyal, Nir; Folsom, Amanda; Halina Tun Hussein, Rozita; Morales, Cristian; Ostmann, Florian; Ottersen, Trygve; Prakongsai, Phusit; Saenz, Carla; Saleh, Karima; Sommanustweechai, Angkana; Wikler, Daniel; Zakariah, Afisah
• Is Part Of: Health systems and reform. Volume 3:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 301
• Page End: 312
• Publication Date: 2017-10-02
• Subjects: financial risk protection -- health care justice -- priority setting -- reasoning about justice -- universal health coverage; Health care reform -- Periodicals; 362.1042
• DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2017.1324938
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-8604

Abstract

Abstract: Abstract —Progress toward universal health coverage (UHC) requires making difficult trade-offs. In this journal, Dr. Margaret Chan, the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General, has endorsed the principles for making such decisions put forward by the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and UHC. These principles include maximizing population health, priority for the worse off, and shielding people from health-related financial risks. But how should one apply these principles in particular cases, and how should one adjudicate between them when their demands conflict? This article by some members of the Consultative Group and a diverse group of health policy professionals addresses these questions. It considers three stylized versions of actual policy dilemmas. Each of these cases pertains to one of the three key dimensions of progress toward UHC: which services to cover first, which populations to prioritize for coverage, and how to move from out-of-pocket expenditures to prepayment with pooling of funds. Our cases are simplified to highlight common trade-offs. Though we make specific recommendations, our primary aim is to demonstrate both the form and substance of the reasoning involved in striking a fair balance between competing interests on the road to UHC.