Modelling and investigation on heat transfer deterioration during transpiration cooling with liquid coolant phase-change. (5th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dong, Wenjie; Wang, Jianhua; Chen, Siyuan; Ai, Bangcheng; Luo, Xiaoguang
• Is Part Of: Applied thermal engineering. Volume 128(2018)
• Page Start: 381
• Page End: 392
• Publication Date: 2018-01-05
• Subjects: Transpiration cooling -- Phase change -- Heat transfer deterioration -- Porous matrix; Heat engineering -- Periodicals; Heating -- Equipment and supplies -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 621.40205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.155
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-4311

Abstract

Highlights: A new model describing transpiration cooling with phase change is suggested. Model and numerical solutions are validated by comparisons with the previous literatures. The heat transfer deterioration due to vapor locking pores is studied. Three improvements are demonstrated and compared to prevent the heat transfer deterioration. Abstract: In this paper, a new mathematical model is suggested to describe the two-dimensional problems of the transpiration cooling with liquid coolant phase change, to simulate and analyze the effects of locally high heat flux on surface temperature and coolant flow within porous matrix. The numerical simulations indicate that the locally high heat flux significantly influences the coolant flow performances, and lead to distinct heat transfer deterioration, i.e. local vapor blocks the porous matrix, and liquid coolant flows into the region far from the superheated vapor region, which results in a higher temperature of the superheated region. Numerical analyses of different parameters reveal that the heat transfer deterioration is more serious in uniform porous matrix with a lower thermal conductivity and a larger porosity. To prevent the heat transfer deterioration, this paper demonstrates and compares the following three approaches: (1) varying local porosity and conductivity of the porous matrix; (2) using two solid walls to separate the porous matrix into three chambers; (3) varying the local thickness of the porous matrix. Using the three approaches, the maximal temperature at hot side can drop by approximately 40%, 55% and 5%, respectively. The comparisons show that the second method is more effective.