Air source heat pump with water heater based on a bypass-cycle defrosting system using compressor casing thermal storage. (5th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Zhongbao; Fan, Pengyan; Wang, Qinghua; Chi, Ying; Zhao, Zhongqian; Chi, Yuanying
• Is Part Of: Applied thermal engineering. Volume 128(2018)
• Page Start: 1420
• Page End: 1429
• Publication Date: 2018-01-05
• Subjects: Defrosting -- Compressor casing -- Heat storage -- Phase change material -- Heat pump -- Bypass cycle; Heat engineering -- Periodicals; Heating -- Equipment and supplies -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 621.40205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.131
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-4311

Abstract

Highlights: ASHP with water heater using compressor casing thermal storage is developed. The total defrosting time and consumption were lower than those of RCD. 10 L hot water with a temperature of 30 °C was obtained during the normal heating for 2.5 h. The compressor casing temperature was reduced by 4.6 °C. Abstract: In this study, the defrosting system of an air source heat pump utilizing compressor casing heat storage combined with a hot gas bypass cycle (ASHP-CCHS-HGBC) was designed. The phase change material for defrosting was selected, the phase change heat storage exchanger was devised, and the ASHP-CCHS-HGBC test system was established. The power consumption, defrosting time, and the influence of the indoor exchanger outlet on the air temperature in the ASHP-CCHS-HGBC method were then compared with those of the reverse-cycle defrosting (RCD) and electric heating defrosting (EHD) methods. Experimental results reveal that the total defrosting time and consumption of the ASHP-CCHS-HGBC method was 100 s and 43.6 kJ, respectively. These values were lower by 10 s (9%) and 12.1 kJ (21.7%) relative to those of RCD. Moreover, the compressor suction temperature was increased by 10.1 °C during defrosting by ASHP-CCHS-HGBC. Under the normal heating operation for 2.5 h, 10 L hot water with a temperature of 30 °C was obtained, the compressor casing temperature was reduced by 4.6 °C. While defrosting, the air temperature of the indoor heat exchanger outlet declined to only 3.3 °C and exerted the least influence on the indoor temperature among those of the three defrosting methods.