Monte Carlo skin dose simulation in intraoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer using spherical applicators. (28th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moradi, F; Ung, N M; Khandaker, M U; Mahdiraji, G A; Saad, M; Abdul Malik, R; Bustam, A Z; Zaili, Z; Bradley, D A
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 62:Number 16(2017:Aug.)
• Page Start: 6550
• Page End: 6566
• Publication Date: 2017-07-28
• Subjects: breast IORT -- Monte Carlo simulation -- skin dose -- photon spectrum -- intrabeam; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7fe6
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: The relatively new treatment modality electronic intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is gaining popularity, irradiation being obtained within a surgically produced cavity being delivered via a low-energy x-ray source and spherical applicators, primarily for early stage breast cancer. Due to the spatially dramatic dose-rate fall off with radial distance from the source and effects related to changes in the beam quality of the low keV photon spectra, dosimetric account of the Intrabeam system is rather complex. Skin dose monitoring in IORT is important due to the high dose prescription per treatment fraction. In this study, modeling of the x-ray source and related applicators were performed using the Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code. The dosimetric characteristics of the model were validated against measured data obtained using an ionization chamber and EBT3 film as dosimeters. By using a simulated breast phantom, absorbed doses to the skin for different combinations of applicator size (1.5–5 cm) and treatment depth (0.5–3 cm) were calculated. Simulation results showed overdosing of the skin (>30% of prescribed dose) at a treatment depth of 0.5 cm using applicator sizes larger than 1.5 cm. Skin doses were significantly increased with applicator size, insofar as delivering 12 Gy (60% of the prescribed dose) to skin for the largest sized applicator (5 cm diameter) and treatment depth of 0.5 cm. It is concluded that the recommended 0.5–1 cm distance between the skin and applicator surface does not guarantee skin safety and skin dose is generally more significant in cases with the larger applicators. Highlights: Intrabeam x-ray source and spherical applicators were simulated and skin dose was calculated. Skin dose for constant skin to applicator distance strongly depends on applicator size. Use of larger applicators generally results in higher skin dose. The recommended 0.5–1 cm skin to applicator distance does not guarantee skin safety.