Clinical Course of Motor Deficits from Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Due to Disk Herniation. Issue 8 (28th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Akuthota, Venu; Marshall, Ben; Boimbo, Sandra; Osborne, Mark C.; Garvan, Cynthia S.; Garvan, Gerard J.; Buzanowska, Marzena; Sauerwein, Kelly; Sridhar, Balaji V.; Plastaras, Christopher T.
• Is Part Of: PM&R. Volume 11:Issue 8(2019)
• Page Start: 807
• Page End: 814
• Publication Date: 2019-03-28
• Subjects: Medical rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Physical therapy -- Periodicals; Physical Therapy Modalities -- Periodicals; 615.5
• DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12082
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1934-1482

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The clinical course of motor deficits from lumbosacral radiculopathy appears to improve with or without surgery. Strength measurements have been confined to manual muscle testing (MMT) and have not been extensively followed and quantified in prior studies. Objective: To determine if motor weakness and patient‐reported outcomes related to lumbosacral radiculopathy improve without surgical intervention over the course of 12 months. Design: Prospective observational cohort. Setting: Outpatient academic spine practice. Participants: Adults with acute radicular weakness due to disk herniation. Methods: Forty patients with radiculopathy and strength deficit were followed over a 12‐month period. Objective strength and performance tests as well as survey‐based measurements were collected at baseline and then every 3 months. Patients underwent comprehensive pain management and rehabilitation and/or surgical approaches as determined in coordination with the treating specialist. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Colorado. Main Outcome Measurements: Testing of strength was through MMT, handheld dynamometer, and performance‐based testing. Furthermore, visual analog scale, modified Oswestry Disability Index, and 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) were used to measure pain and disability outcomes. Results: Of the 40 patients, 33 (82.5%) did not have surgery; 7 (17.5%) had surgery. Twenty‐four of the 33 patients (60%) did not undergo surgery and were followed for 12 months (Comprehensive Pain Management and Rehabilitation, Complete [CPM&R‐C]), and 9 (22%) did not have surgery and lacked at least one follow‐up evaluation (Comprehensive Pain Management and Rehabilitation, Incomplete [CPM&R‐I]). No statistically significant differences were found on baseline measures of strength deficits and SF‐36 domains between the CPM&R‐C, Surgery, and CPM&R‐I groups. Pain and disability scores in the Surgery group were significantly higher than in the CPM&R‐C at baseline. There were statistically significant improvements in all areas of strength, pain, and function when comparing measurements at the 12‐month follow‐up to baseline in the CPM&R‐C group. Conclusions: Individuals with motor deficits due to lumbosacral radiculopathy improve over time regardless of treatment choice. Most did not choose surgery, and almost all of these patients regained full strength at 1 year. Strength recovery typically occurred in the first 3 months, but there was ongoing recovery over the course of a year. Level of Evidence: II