An EPID‐based method to determine mechanical deformations in a linear accelerator. Issue 11 (12th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gourdeau, Daniel; Gingras, Luc; Beaulieu, Frédéric; Leclerc, Ghyslain; Archambault, Louis
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 45:Issue 11(2018)
• Page Start: 5054
• Page End: 5065
• Publication Date: 2018-10-12
• Subjects: geometric calibration -- isocenter check -- linear accelerator -- radiation therapy; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.13184
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Medical linear accelerators (linac) are delivering increasingly complex treatments using modern techniques in radiation therapy. Complete and precise mechanical QA of the linac is therefore necessary to ensure that there is no unexpected deviation from the gantry's planned course. However, state‐of‐the‐art EPID‐based mechanical QA procedures often neglect some degrees of freedom (DOF) like the in‐plane rotations of the gantry and imager or the source movements inside the gantry head. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to characterize a 14 DOF method for the mechanical QA of linacs. This method seeks to measure every mechanical deformation in a linac, including source movements, in addition to relevant clinical parameters like mechanical and radiation isocenters. Methods: A widely available commercial phantom and a custom‐made accessory inserted in the linac's interface mount are imaged using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) at multiple gantry angles. Then, simulated images are generated using the nominal geometry of the linac and digitized models of the phantoms. The nominal geometry used to generate these images can be modified using 14 DOF (3 rigid rotations and 3 translations for the imager and the gantry, and 2 in‐plane translations of the source) and any change will modify the simulated image. The set of mechanical deformations that minimizes the differences between the simulated and measured image is found using a genetic algorithm coupled with a gradient‐descent optimizer. Phantom mispositioning and gantry angular offset were subsequently calculated and extracted from the results. Simulations of the performances of the method for different levels of noise in the phantom models were performed to calculate the absolute uncertainty of the measured mechanical deformations. The measured source positions and the center of collimation were used to define the beam central axis and calculate the radiation isocenter position and radius. Results: After the simultaneous optimization of the 14 DOF, the average distance between the center of the measured and simulated ball bearings on the imager was 0.086 mm. Over the course of a full counter‐clockwise gantry rotation, all mechanical deformations were measured, showing sub‐millimeter translations and rotations smaller than 1° along every axis. The average absolute uncertainty of the 14 DOF (1 SD) was 0.15 mm or degree. Phantom positioning errors were determined with more than 0.1 mm precision. Errors introduced in the experimental setup like phantom positioning errors, source movements or gantry angular offsets were all successfully detected by our QA method. The mechanical deformations measured are shown to be reproducible over the course of a few weeks and are not sensitive to the experimental setup. Conclusion: This work presents of new method for an accurate mechanical QA of the linacs. It features a 14 DOF model of the mechanical deformations that is both more complete and precise than other available methods. It has demonstrated sub‐millimeter accuracy through simulation and experimentation. Introduced errors were successfully detected with high precision.