Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2O emissions. (24th November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2O emissions. (24th November 2017)
- Main Title:
- Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2O emissions
- Authors:
- Ehrhardt, Fiona
Soussana, Jean‐François
Bellocchi, Gianni
Grace, Peter
McAuliffe, Russel
Recous, Sylvie
Sándor, Renáta
Smith, Pete
Snow, Val
de Antoni Migliorati, Massimiliano
Basso, Bruno
Bhatia, Arti
Brilli, Lorenzo
Doltra, Jordi
Dorich, Christopher D.
Doro, Luca
Fitton, Nuala
Giacomini, Sandro J.
Grant, Brian
Harrison, Matthew T.
Jones, Stephanie K.
Kirschbaum, Miko U. F.
Klumpp, Katja
Laville, Patricia
Léonard, Joël
Liebig, Mark
Lieffering, Mark
Martin, Raphaël
Massad, Raia S.
Meier, Elizabeth
Merbold, Lutz
Moore, Andrew D.
Myrgiotis, Vasileios
Newton, Paul
Pattey, Elizabeth
Rolinski, Susanne
Sharp, Joanna
Smith, Ward N.
Wu, Lianhai
Zhang, Qing
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Simulation models are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions. However, the uncertainties of (reduced) model ensemble simulations have not been assessed systematically for variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation, within multi‐species agricultural contexts. We report an international model comparison and benchmarking exercise, showing the potential of multi‐model ensembles to predict productivity and nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions for wheat, maize, rice and temperate grasslands. Using a multi‐stage modelling protocol, from blind simulations (stage 1) to partial (stages 2–4) and full calibration (stage 5), 24 process‐based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as an ensemble against long‐term experimental data from four temperate grassland and five arable crop rotation sites spanning four continents. Comparisons were performed by reference to the experimental uncertainties of observed yields and N2 O emissions. Results showed that across sites and crop/grassland types, 23%–40% of the uncalibrated individual models were within two standard deviations ( SD ) of observed yields, while 42 (rice) to 96% (grasslands) of the models were within 1 SD of observed N2 O emissions. At stage 1, ensembles formed by the three lowest prediction model errors predicted both yields and N2 O emissions within experimental uncertainties for 44% and 33% of the crop and grassland growth cycles, respectively.Abstract: Simulation models are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions. However, the uncertainties of (reduced) model ensemble simulations have not been assessed systematically for variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation, within multi‐species agricultural contexts. We report an international model comparison and benchmarking exercise, showing the potential of multi‐model ensembles to predict productivity and nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions for wheat, maize, rice and temperate grasslands. Using a multi‐stage modelling protocol, from blind simulations (stage 1) to partial (stages 2–4) and full calibration (stage 5), 24 process‐based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as an ensemble against long‐term experimental data from four temperate grassland and five arable crop rotation sites spanning four continents. Comparisons were performed by reference to the experimental uncertainties of observed yields and N2 O emissions. Results showed that across sites and crop/grassland types, 23%–40% of the uncalibrated individual models were within two standard deviations ( SD ) of observed yields, while 42 (rice) to 96% (grasslands) of the models were within 1 SD of observed N2 O emissions. At stage 1, ensembles formed by the three lowest prediction model errors predicted both yields and N2 O emissions within experimental uncertainties for 44% and 33% of the crop and grassland growth cycles, respectively. Partial model calibration (stages 2–4) markedly reduced prediction errors of the full model ensemble E‐median for crop grain yields (from 36% at stage 1 down to 4% on average) and grassland productivity (from 44% to 27%) and to a lesser and more variable extent for N2 O emissions. Yield‐scaled N2 O emissions (N2 O emissions divided by crop yields) were ranked accurately by three‐model ensembles across crop species and field sites. The potential of using process‐based model ensembles to predict jointly productivity and N2 O emissions at field scale is discussed. Abstract : The potential of simulation models used to predict variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation has not been systematically assessed. We report an international intercomparison of 24 process‐based models for the estimation of agricultural productivity and N2 O emissions (individually or as ensembles) against nine long‐term experimental datasets (rotational crops and grasslands) using a five‐stage modelling protocol. Uncalibrated multi‐model medians were within the range of observed uncertainties for grain yields (wheat, maize and rice) and N2 O emissions, while were poor predictor for grasslands ANPP. N2 O emissions intensities ranked accurately with reduced ensembles (three models) across stages, crop species and sites. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Global change biology. Volume 24:Number 2(2018)
- Journal:
- Global change biology
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Number 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0024-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- e603
- Page End:
- e616
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11-24
- Subjects:
- agriculture -- benchmarking -- biogeochemical models -- climate change -- greenhouse gases -- nitrous oxide -- soil -- yield
Climatic changes -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals
Troposphere -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals
Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals
Eutrophication -- Periodicals
551.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=gcb ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/gcb.13965 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1354-1013
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4195.358330
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11223.xml