Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Fifteen Years' Experience at a Scottish Tertiary Cancer Center. Issue 9 (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: May, James; Skorupskaite, Karolina; Congiu, Mario; Ghaoui, Nidal; Walker, Graeme A.; Fegan, Scott; Martin, Cameron W.; O'Donnell, Rachel Louise
• Is Part Of: International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 28:Issue 9(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: Borderline ovarian tumors -- Malignant transformation -- Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential -- Prognosis -- Recurrence/relapse; Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99465
• DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001364
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1048-891X

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Since the recognition of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) in the 1970s, the management of this subset of epithelial ovarian tumors has presented a challenge to clinicians. The majority present at an early stage, but their diagnosis is often only made following surgery, hence the heterogeneity of surgical management. Borderline ovarian tumors are morphologically diverse, and their behavior is subsequently also heterogeneous. We aimed to assess recurrence rates and the rate of malignant transformation in patients diagnosed with BOT. Secondary objectives included a review of current management and assessment of tumor markers, stage, cyst dimensions, and the presence of micropapillary features as prognostic indicators of recurrence. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients treated with BOT between 2000 and 2015 in the southeast region of Scotland. Clinical, surgicopathological, and follow-up data were collated. Data were analyzed with reference to recurrence and malignant transformation. Results: Two hundred seventy-five patients underwent treatment for BOT in the study period. Surgical management was highly variable. A diagnosis of recurrent/persistent BOT or ovarian malignancy following initial treatment of BOT was rare, with only 12 (4%) of 275 cases. There were 7 cases (3%) of ovarian malignancy. Advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was the most prominent prognostic factor. Elevated preoperative serum CA-125 and the presence of micropapillary features correlated with advanced stage at presentation. With a lack of clear guidance, follow-up was highly variable with a median of 43 months (0–136 months). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the largest BOT cohort in the United Kingdom. Recurrent disease is rare in optimally staged, completely resected, early-stage BOT, without high-risk features. Caution is needed in women electing not to undergo completion staging after diagnosis and in those opting for a fertility-preserving approach. Thorough informed consent and clear plans for surveillance and follow-up are needed with consideration of delayed completion surgery as appropriate.