Estimating relative efficacy in acute postoperative pain: network meta-analysis is consistent with indirect comparison to placebo alone. Issue 11 (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moore, R. Andrew; Derry, Sheena; Wiffen, Philip J.; Banerjee, Samik; Karan, Rajesh; Glimm, Ekkehard; Wiksten, Anna; Aldington, Dominic; Eccleston, Christopher
• Is Part Of: Pain. Volume 159:Issue 11(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: Network meta-analysis -- Postoperative pain -- Systematic review -- Cochrane; Pain -- Periodicals; Douleur -- Périodiques; Anesthésie -- Périodiques; Pain; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.0472
• DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001322
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0304-3959

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Network meta-analysis uses direct comparisons of interventions within randomized controlled trials and indirect comparisons across them. Network meta-analysis uses more data than a series of direct comparisons with placebo, and theoretically should produce more reliable results. We used a Cochrane overview review of acute postoperative pain trials and other systematic reviews to provide data to test this hypothesis. Some 261 trials published between 1966 and 2016 included 39, 753 patients examining 52 active drug and dose combinations (27, 726 given active drug and 12, 027 placebo), in any type of surgery (72% dental). Most trials were small; 42% of patients were in trials with arms <50 patients, and 27% in trials with arms ≥100 patients. Response to placebo in third molar extraction fell by half in studies over 30 to 40 years (171 trials, 7882 patients given placebo). Network meta-analysis and Cochrane analyses provided very similar results (average difference 0.04 number needed to treat units), with no significant difference for almost all comparisons apart from some with small patient numbers or small effect size, or both. Network meta-analysis did not detect significant differences between effective analgesics. The similarity between network meta-analysis and Cochrane indirect analyses probably arose from stringent quality criteria in trials accepted in Cochrane reviews (with consequent low risk of bias) and consistency in methods and outcomes. Network meta-analysis is a useful analytical tool that increases our confidence in estimates of efficacy of analgesics in acute postoperative pain, in this case by providing similar results. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.There was no significant difference between network meta-analysis and simple placebo comparisons in postoperative pain using 261 trials, 39, 753 patients, and 52 drug/dose combinations.