Comparing Three Lane Merging Schemes for Short-Term Work Zones: A Simulation Study. (5th February 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Harb, Rami; Radwan, Essam; Dixit, Vinayak V.
• Other Names: Nelson J. D. Academic Editor.; Raftoyiannis I. G. Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: ISRN civil engineering. Volume 2012(2012)
• Publication Date: 2012-02-05
• Subjects: Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Civil engineering; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 624
• DOI: 10.5402/2012/507269
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-5106

Abstract

Abstract : Traffic safety and mobility of roadway work zones have been considered to be one of the major concerns in highway traffic safety and operations in Florida. Dynamic lane merging (DLM) systems—ITS-based lane management technology—were introduced by several states in an attempt to enhance both safety and mobility of roadway work zones. Two forms of lane merging, namely, the early merge and the late merge were designed to advise drivers on definite merging locations. Up to date, there are no studies that contrast both merging schemes under matching work zone settings. This study simulates a two-to-one work zone lane closure configuration under three different Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) plans in VISSIM. The first MOT is the conventional plans used in Florida's work zones, the second MOT is a simplified dynamic early merging system (early SDLMS), and the third MOT is a simplified dynamic late merging systems (late SDLMSs). Field data was collected to calibrate and validate the simulation models. Simulation results indicated that overall, under different levels of drivers' compliance rate and different percentages of trucks in the traffic composition, the early SLDMS outperformed the conventional MOT and the late SDLMS in terms of travel times and throughputs.