Determination of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)valine in globin of ethylene oxide-exposed workers using total acidic hydrolysis and HPLC–ESI–MS2. (1st December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mráz, Jaroslav; Hanzlíková, Iveta; Dušková, Šárka; Tvrdíková, Monika; Chrástecká, Hana; Vajtrová, Radka; Linhart, Igor
• Is Part Of: Toxicology letters. Volume 298(2018)
• Page Start: 76
• Page End: 80
• Publication Date: 2018-12-01
• Subjects: Ethylene oxide -- Globin adducts -- Protein hydrolysis -- N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)valine -- Biological monitoring; Toxicology -- Periodicals; 363.179
• DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.06.1212
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0378-4274

Abstract

Highlights: Ethylene oxide adduct with valine in globin measured after hydrolysis and HPLC–MS 2 . Alternative analytical procedure for biomonitoring of ethylene oxide exposure. Globin hydrolysis and HPLC–ESI–MS 2 superior to modified Edman degradation. Abstract: Ethylene oxide (EO), an industrial intermediate and gaseous sterilant for medical devices, is carcinogenic to humans, which warrants minimization of exposure in the workplaces. The principal analytical strategy currently used in biomonitoring of exposure to EO consists in the conversion of N -(2-hydroxyethyl) adduct at the N -terminal valine (HEV) in globin to a specific thiohydantoin derivative accessible to GC–MS analysis (modified Edman degradation, MED). Though highly sensitive, the method is laborious and, at least in our hands, not sufficiently robust. Here we developed an alternative strategy of HEV determination based on acidic hydrolysis (AH) of globin followed directly by HPLC–ESI–MS 2 analysis. Limit of quantitation is ca. 25 pmol HEV/g globin. Comparative analyses of globin samples from EO-exposed workers by both the AH-based and MED-based methods provided results that correlated well with each other (R 2 > 0.95) but those obtained with AH were significantly more accurate (according to external quality control programme G-EQUAS) and repeatible (5% and 6% for intra-day and between-day analyses, respectively). In conclusion, the new AH-based method surpassed MED being similarly sensitive, much less laborious and more reliable, thus applicable as an effective tool for biomonitoring of EO in exposure control and risk assessment.