Predictions of the quantum landscape multiverse. (18th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mersini-Houghton, Laura
• Is Part Of: Classical and quantum gravity. Volume 34:Number 4(2017:Feb.)
• Publication Date: 2017-01-18
• Subjects: wavefunction of universe -- quantum cosmology -- landscape -- quantum theory -- field theory; Quantum gravity -- Periodicals; Gravitation -- Periodicals; Relativity (Physics) -- Periodicals; Space and time -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 521.1
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/34/4/047001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-9381

Abstract

Abstract: The 2015 Planck data release has placed tight constraints on the class of inflationary models allowed. The current best fit region favors concave downwards inflationary potentials, since they produce a suppressed tensor to scalar index ratio r . Concave downward potentials have a negative curvature V ′ ′, therefore a tachyonic mass square that drives fluctuations. Furthermore, their use can become problematic if the field rolls in a part of the potential away from the extrema, since the semiclassical approximation of quantum cosmology, used for deriving the most probable wavefunction of the universe from the landscape and for addressing the quantum to classical transition, breaks down away from the steepest descent region. We here propose a way of dealing with such potentials by inverting the metric signature and solving for the wavefunction of the universe in the Euclidean sector. This method allows us to extend our theory of the origin of the universe from a quantum multiverse, to a more general class of concave inflationary potentials where a straightforward application of the semiclassical approximation fails. The work here completes the derivation of modifications to the Newtonian potential and to the inflationary potential, which originate from the quantum entanglement of our universe with all others in the quantum landscape multiverse, leading to predictions of observational signatures for both types of inflationary models, concave and convex potentials.