Plenoptic particle image velocimetry with multiple plenoptic cameras. (25th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fahringer, Timothy W; Thurow, Brian S
• Is Part Of: Measurement science & technology. Volume 29:Number 7(2018:Jul.)
• Publication Date: 2018-05-25
• Subjects: plenoptic -- particle image velocimetry -- three-dimensional -- light field imaging; Physical measurements -- Periodicals; Scientific apparatus and instruments -- Periodicals; Equipment and Supplies -- Periodicals; Science -- instrumentation -- Periodicals; Technology -- instrumentation -- Periodicals; Mesures physiques -- Périodiques; Physical measurements; Scientific apparatus and instruments; Periodicals; 502.87
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/aabe1d
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0957-0233

Abstract

Abstract: Plenoptic particle image velocimetry was recently introduced as a viable three-dimensional, three-component velocimetry technique based on light field cameras. One of the main benefits of this technique is its single camera configuration allowing the technique to be applied in facilities with limited optical access. The main drawback of this configuration is decreased accuracy in the out-of-plane dimension. This work presents a solution with the addition of a second plenoptic camera in a stereo-like configuration. A framework for reconstructing volumes with multiple plenoptic cameras including the volumetric calibration and reconstruction algorithms, including: integral refocusing, filtered refocusing, multiplicative refocusing, and MART are presented. It is shown that the addition of a second camera improves the reconstruction quality and removes the 'cigar'-like elongation associated with the single camera system. In addition, it is found that adding a third camera provides minimal improvement. Further metrics of the reconstruction quality are quantified in terms of a reconstruction algorithm, particle density, number of cameras, camera separation angle, voxel size, and the effect of common image noise sources. In addition, a synthetic Gaussian ring vortex is used to compare the accuracy of the single and two camera configurations. It was determined that the addition of a second camera reduces the RMSE velocity error from 1.0 to 0.1 voxels in depth and 0.2 to 0.1 voxels in the lateral spatial directions. Finally, the technique is applied experimentally on a ring vortex and comparisons are drawn from the four presented reconstruction algorithms, where it was found that MART and multiplicative refocusing produced the cleanest vortex structure and had the least shot-to-shot variability. Filtered refocusing is able to produce the desired structure, albeit with more noise and variability, while integral refocusing struggled to produce a coherent vortex ring.