Beta-gamma oscillation reveals learning from unexpected reward in learners versus non-learners. (August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Jing; Zhang, Jiahui; Li, Peng; Martens, Sander; Luo, Yuejia
• Is Part Of: Neuropsychologia. Volume 131(2019)
• Page Start: 266
• Page End: 274
• Publication Date: 2019-08
• Subjects: Beta-gamma -- FMT -- Reward positivity -- Reinforcement learning -- Individual differences; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Neuropsychologie -- Périodiques; Neuropsychology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3932

Abstract

Abstract: Beta-gamma oscillation has been demonstrated to be sensitive to unexpected reward feedback. However, it remains unclear whether beta-gamma activity manifests individual differences in reinforcement learning processing. Given that individuals differ largely in reinforcement learning tasks, we adapted the Friedland task and split subjects into two groups: learners who learned to choose the optimal card after training and non-learners who did not learn well. We used recorded electroencephalography signals to test the difference in brain activity between the learners and non-learners groups when participants conducted a time estimation task and received win and loss feedback in expected and unexpected conditions. The results revealed that the unexpected condition elicited a larger reward positivity amplitude than did the expected condition, but only in the learners group. No significant difference was found between the two groups for the expectancy effect on frontal-midline theta. The current results thus demonstrate that for learners, unexpected win feedback elicits a larger beta-gamma oscillation than expected win feedback, while this was not the case for non-learners. These results indicate that beta-gamma oscillation may reflect effective learning from positive reward prediction error, a finding that adds to the existing theories on learning processes. Highlights: Unexpected win feedback elicited a large beta-gamma oscillation only for Learners. Unexpected outcome elicited robust reward positivity only in the learners group. Theta oscillation was enhanced by unexpected negative feedback in both groups.