Absence and presence of social complexity in the marketization of sustainable tourism. (16th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hultman, Johan; Säwe, Filippa
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 111:Part B(2016:Jan)
• Page Start: 327
• Page End: 335
• Publication Date: 2016-01-16
• Subjects: Sustainable tourism -- Fishing strategy -- Recreational fishing -- Resource management -- Discourse analysis; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: The EU strategy for rural development 2014–2020 proposes a focus on tourism as a solution to bring economic, environmental and social aspects of sustainable development together. Using the case of fishing tourism in Sweden, we discuss the marketization of sustainable development on a destination market. We focus on the discursive and practical tension between ambitions for development and maintenance. In a two-step analysis, we problematize the win–win consensus of sustainable tourism discourse in relation to different stakeholders' competing uses of limited resources in practice. We show how stakeholders understand the stakes of sustainable tourism as either lost opportunities for development due to failed regulation of a natural resource, or as deteriorating social relations due to failed maintenance of socio-cultural values. We argue for the acknowledgement of social complexity in market theoretizations in order to transfer sustainable tourism from the agenda of business potential and traditional marketing to the domain of participatory politics. Highlights: A market theoretization of sustainable development on a market of destinations. Sustainable tourism as a dynamic between development and maintenance. A problematization of the win—win rhetoric of sustainable tourism discourse. Competing logics of a regulatory and a relational approach to limited resources.