Comparison of machine learning models for seizure prediction in hospitalized patients. Issue 7 (27th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Struck, Aaron F.; Rodriguez‐Ruiz, Andres A.; Osman, Gamaledin; Gilmore, Emily J.; Haider, Hiba A.; Dhakar, Monica B.; Schrettner, Matthew; Lee, Jong W.; Gaspard, Nicolas; Hirsch, Lawrence J.; Westover, M. Brandon
• Is Part Of: Annals of clinical and translational neurology. Volume 6:Issue 7(2019)
• Page Start: 1239
• Page End: 1247
• Publication Date: 2019-06-27
• Subjects: Nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 616.8005
• DOI: 10.1002/acn3.50817
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-9503

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare machine learning methods for predicting inpatient seizures risk and determine the feasibility of 1‐h screening EEG to identify low‐risk patients (<5% seizures risk in 48 h). Methods: The Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium (CCEMRC) multicenter database contains 7716 continuous EEGs (cEEG). Neural networks (NN), elastic net logistic regression (EN), and sparse linear integer model (RiskSLIM) were trained to predict seizures. RiskSLIM was used previously to generate 2HELPS2B model of seizure predictions. Data were divided into training (60% for model fitting) and evaluation (40% for model evaluation) cohorts. Performance was measured using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), mean risk calibration (CAL), and negative predictive value (NPV). A secondary analysis was performed using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) to normalize all EEG recordings to 48 h and use only the first hour of EEG as a "screening EEG" to generate predictions. Results: RiskSLIM recreated the 2HELPS2B model. All models had comparable AUC: evaluation cohort (NN: 0.85, EN: 0.84, 2HELPS2B: 0.83) and MCS (NN: 0.82, EN; 0.82, 2HELPS2B: 0.81) and NPV (absence of seizures in the group that the models predicted to be low risk): evaluation cohort (NN: 97%, EN: 97%, 2HELPS2B: 97%) and MCS (NN: 97%, EN: 99%, 2HELPS2B: 97%). 2HELPS2B model was able to identify the largest proportion of low‐risk patients. Interpretation: For seizure risk stratification of hospitalized patients, the RiskSLIM generated 2HELPS2B model compares favorably to the complex NN and EN generated models. 2HELPS2B is able to accurately and quickly identify low‐risk patients with only a 1‐h screening EEG.