Household car adoption and financial distress in deprived urban communities: A case of forced car ownership?. (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Curl, Angela; Clark, Julie; Kearns, Ade
• Is Part Of: Transport policy. Volume 65(2018)
• Page Start: 61
• Page End: 71
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: Forced car ownership -- Financial difficulties -- Deprived communities -- Employment -- Transport policy -- Regeneration; Transportation and state -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Rates -- Periodicals; 388
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.01.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-070X

Abstract

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between car ownership and financial circumstances for people living in disadvantaged urban communities. Assumptions about cars signifying status and income are problematised by an examination of the characteristics of those who adopt cars. We consider the possibility that, despite low incomes and financial problems, cars may be a necessity for some urban dwellers. Patterns of car ownership and adoption are analysed using cross-sectional and longitudinal survey data collected from communities in Glasgow, between 2006 and 2011, before, during and after the recession. Car ownership rates increased, as more people adopted a car than relinquished vehicles. The likelihood of household car adoption was influenced by changes in household size, increased financial difficulties in relation to housing costs, and where householders gained work. A small but growing proportion of households (up to 8.5% by 2011) are deemed 'forced car owners' by virtue of owning a car despite also reporting financial difficulties: three-quarters of this group maintain a car despite financial problems whilst a quarter adopt a car despite financial problems. Findings suggest that poor households are reluctant to relinquish their cars to ease money problems when under financial stress and that, for some, acquiring a car may be seen as necessary to better their circumstances. In neither case can we see evidence that the sustainable transport agenda is reaching disadvantaged communities and there are concerns that regeneration strategies are failing to promote mobility and accessibility for poor communities via transport policies. Highlights: Car ownership is complex to understand in deprived communities. Austerity has weakened the car ownership – financial circumstances relationship. There is some evidence to support a growing issue of forced car ownership. Car adoption is more likely among those becoming unemployed or entering work. Transport and regeneration policy must work holistically to reduce car dependence.