Optimal cumulative cisplatin dose in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on induction chemotherapy response. (August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Optimal cumulative cisplatin dose in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on induction chemotherapy response. (August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Optimal cumulative cisplatin dose in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on induction chemotherapy response
- Authors:
- Liu, Sai-Lan
Sun, Xue-Song
Yan, Jin-Jie
Chen, Qiu-Yan
Lin, Huan-Xin
Wen, Yue-Feng
Guo, Shan-Shan
Liu, Li-Ting
Xie, Hao-Jun
Tang, Qing-Nan
Liang, Yu-Jing
Li, Xiao-Yun
Lin, Chao
Du, Yu-Yun
Yang, Zhen-Chong
Xiao, Bei-Bei
Yang, Jin-Hao
Tang, Lin-Quan
Guo, Ling
Mai, Hai-Qiang - Abstract:
- Highlights: Tumor response to IC was an independent prognostic factor for patients with NPC. Patients receiving >200 mg/m 2 CCD had significantly improved 3-year PFS and DMFS. Medium dose group showed similar efficacy as high group but with fewer toxicities. Balancing toxicity and efficacy, 200 mg/m 2 seemed to be the optimal in CR/PR groups. Enhancement of CCD did not provide survival benefit for SD/PD patients after IC. Abstract: Background and purpose: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients can be separated into two risk subgroups according to tumor responses to induction chemotherapy (IC). We aimed to elucidate the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for different NPC patient subgroups. Participants and methods: A total of 990 patients with incident NPC diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 treated with IC plus CCRT were included in our observational study. The clinicopathological features of patients with different tumor responses were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Prognosis was assessed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. In addition, acute and late toxicities were compared between different CCD groups. Results: After IC, 761/990 (76.9%) patients had a complete tumor response (CR)/partial response (PR) and 229 (23.1%) had stable disease (SD)/disease progression (PD). An unsatisfactory tumor response (SD/PD) after IC correlated with poor clinical outcome (3-year PFS 61.4% vs. 83.2%, PHighlights: Tumor response to IC was an independent prognostic factor for patients with NPC. Patients receiving >200 mg/m 2 CCD had significantly improved 3-year PFS and DMFS. Medium dose group showed similar efficacy as high group but with fewer toxicities. Balancing toxicity and efficacy, 200 mg/m 2 seemed to be the optimal in CR/PR groups. Enhancement of CCD did not provide survival benefit for SD/PD patients after IC. Abstract: Background and purpose: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients can be separated into two risk subgroups according to tumor responses to induction chemotherapy (IC). We aimed to elucidate the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for different NPC patient subgroups. Participants and methods: A total of 990 patients with incident NPC diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 treated with IC plus CCRT were included in our observational study. The clinicopathological features of patients with different tumor responses were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Prognosis was assessed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. In addition, acute and late toxicities were compared between different CCD groups. Results: After IC, 761/990 (76.9%) patients had a complete tumor response (CR)/partial response (PR) and 229 (23.1%) had stable disease (SD)/disease progression (PD). An unsatisfactory tumor response (SD/PD) after IC correlated with poor clinical outcome (3-year PFS 61.4% vs. 83.2%, P < 0.001 and 3-year LRFS 80.9% vs. 94.5%, P < 0.001). Patients who achieved CR/PR after IC received a CCD >200 mg/m 2 and showed higher 3-year PFS and DMFS rates than those receiving a CCD <100 mg/m 2 (PFS: 85.4% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.045; DMFS: 89.4% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.015). Multivariate analysis also showed that CCD was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and DMFS in CR/PR subgroup. Moreover, the medium dose group showed similar efficacy as high dose group but was associated with fewer grade 1–4 acute toxicities. However, application of different CCD didn't result in significantly different survival outcomes in SD/PD subgroup. Conclusions: Tumor response to IC was an independent prognostic factor for patients with NPC. For the patients who achieved CR/PR after IC, patients receiving high CCD showed significantly improved 3-year PFS and DMFS compared with patients receiving low CCD. Balancing toxicity and efficacy, 200 mg/m 2 seemed to be the optimal dose in the CR/PR groups. However, enhancement of CCD did not provide survival benefit for patients who achieved SD/PD after IC, and treatment options for these patients require further consideration. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 137(2019)
- Journal:
- Radiotherapy and oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 137(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 137, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 137
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0137-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 83
- Page End:
- 94
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08
- Subjects:
- NPC nasopharyngeal carcinoma -- RT radiotherapy -- IC induction chemotherapy -- CCRT concurrent chemoradiotherapy -- IC induction chemotherapy -- SD stable disease -- PD disease progression -- CR complete response -- PR partial response -- CCD cumulative cisplatin dose -- IMRT intensity-modulated radiotherapy -- KPS Karnofsky's performance score -- MRI magnetic resonance imaging -- CT computed tomography -- PET/CT positron emission tomography computed tomography -- TPF taxanes, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil -- PF cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil -- TP taxanes and cisplatin -- 2DRT two-dimensional radiotherapy -- EBV Epstein–Barr virus -- OS overall survival -- PFS progression-free survival -- LRFS locoregional relapse-free survival -- DMFS distant metastasis-free survival -- DFS disease free survival -- HR hazard ratio -- CI confidence interval
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma -- Induction chemotherapy -- Tumor response -- Cumulative cisplatin dose
Oncology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.estro.org/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiotherapy-and-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.020 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-8140
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7240.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11159.xml