Evaluation of the prognostic stage in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer in locally advanced breast cancer: An analysis based on SEER 18 database. (February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Maoli; Chen, Hongliang; Wu, Kejin; Ding, Ang; Zhang, Mingdi; Zhang, Peng
• Is Part Of: Breast. Volume 37(2018)
• Page Start: 56
• Page End: 63
• Publication Date: 2018-02
• Subjects: Locally advanced breast cancer -- TNM stage -- Prognostic stage system -- AJCC -- Prognosis; Breast -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Breast -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Breast -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-9776

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The new "prognostic stage" in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) incorporated important biologic factors such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), histologic grade and TNM stage into one system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the "prognostic stage" in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Methods: 10053 LABCs diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 were enrolled. TNM stage was based on AJCC 7th edition. Comparisons of biologic factor proportions among stage changes were performed using Pearson's chi-square test. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank testing with pairwise comparisons between different stages was conducted. Cox models were fitted to assess the independent prognostic factors. Results: The prognostic stage grouped LABC into six stages: IB-IIIC among which IB-IIIA had a relatively better survival. It reassigned 74% LABCs to a different tumor stage. 60.4% cases in grade III and 68.3% cases with triple negative breast cancer were upstaged while 57.1% cases with ER/PR dual positivity were down staged. It was an independent prognostic factor of LABC. There were statistically significant survival differences among stage IB-IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. Among each TNM stage, there were statistically significant survival differences among stage changes. Conclusions: The prognostic stage provided accurate prognostic information for LABC compared with anatomic TNM stage. It will lead to accuracy in prognosis prediction and optimal treatment selection, and therefore, better outcomes. Highlights: The new "prognostic stage" in the 8th edition of AJCC incorporated important biologic factors and TNM stage into one system. The prognostic stage reassigned 74% locally advanced breast cancer patients. According to the prognostic stage 60.4% cases in grade III and 68.3% cases in TNBC were upstaged while 57.1% cases with ER/PR dual positivity were down staged. The prognostic stage was an independent prognostic factor of LABC. Among each TNM stage, there were statistically significant survival differences among stage changes.