A comparison of biotic groups as dry-phase indicators of ecological quality in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams. (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stubbington, Rachel; Paillex, Amael; England, Judy; Barthès, Amélie; Bouchez, Agnès; Rimet, Frédéric; Sánchez-Montoya, María Mar; Westwood, Christian G.; Datry, Thibault
• Is Part Of: Ecological indicators. Volume 97(2019)
• Page Start: 165
• Page End: 174
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: IRES Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams; Bioassessment -- Bioindication -- Ecological status assessment -- Dry riverbeds -- Flow intermittence -- River condition -- Temporary rivers and streams; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 333.71405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.061
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-160X

Abstract

Highlights: We explored aquatic assemblages as dry-phase indicators of health in intermittent rivers. Diatom and plant communities differed at impacted and control sites during dry phases. Communities at unimpacted sites were more diverse and supported more indicator taxa. Diatom, plant and invertebrate indices used during wet phases varied among dry sites. Exploring terrestrial assemblages as dry-phase biomonitors is a research priority. Abstract: Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES) are dynamic ecosystems that shift between aquatic and terrestrial states. IRES are widespread, abundant and increasing in extent, but developing biomonitoring programmes to determine their ecological quality is challenging. To date, quality assessments have focused on the aquatic organisms present during wet phases, whereas dry-phase communities remain poorly characterized. We examined multiple biotic groups present in dry IRES channels, to compare assemblages at sites impacted and unimpacted by human activity and to evaluate the potential of each group as an ecological quality indicator. We explored existing, unpublished data for three biotic groups: an aquatic microflora (diatoms), an aquatic fauna (the invertebrate 'seedbank'), and a mixed flora (aquatic and terrestrial plants); notably, we did not source data for terrestrial assemblages with high potential to act as indicators. Diatom and plant assemblage composition differed between impacted and unimpacted sites, and the latter assemblages were more diverse and included more indicator taxa. Invertebrate seedbank taxa richness was higher at unimpacted sites but compositional differences were not detected, probably due to the coarse taxonomic resolution to which abundant taxa were identified. Performance of standard indices of ecological quality was variable, but differences were identified between impacted and unimpacted conditions for all biotic groups. Our results can inform the enhancement of biomonitoring programmes designed to characterize IRES ecological quality in relation to legislative targets. We highlight the need to integrate wet- and dry-phase survey data in holistic quality assessments. Although we suggest diatoms, aquatic plants and the aquatic invertebrate seedbank as having the potential to inform assessment of dry-phase ecological quality, we highlight the need for research to further characterize these aquatic groups and, crucially, to explore terrestrial assemblages with high potential to act as dry-phase quality indicators.