Forest cover is more important than farmland heterogeneity and livestock intensification for the retention of dung beetle phylogenetic diversity. (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alvarado, Fredy; Andrade, Edyla R.; Santos, Bráulio A.; Prescott, Graham; Souza, Gustavo; Escobar, Federico
• Is Part Of: Ecological indicators. Volume 93(2018)
• Page Start: 524
• Page End: 532
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: Food production -- Land sparing -- Forest protection -- Livestock-dominated landscapes -- Tropical dry forest -- Yucatán -- Mexico; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 333.71405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.041
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-160X

Abstract

Highlights: Balancing the production of meat with preserving biodiversity is a major societal challenge. Conserving phylogenetic diversity (PD) protects evolutionary history and ecological traits. Land sharing increases farmland heterogeneity and land sparing increases forest cover. We investigated the merits of the two strategies in the context of preserving insect PD. To avoid losing PD and increase cattle yield, land sparing is better at 1-km 2 Neotropical landscapes. Abstract: Pasture and grazing land is one of the dominant global land-uses in the Anthropocene. There are two broad strategies for preserving phylogenetic diversity (PD) within livestock regions: land sharing, which increases farmland heterogeneity at the expense of yield and forest cover, and land sparing, which increases forest cover and yields at the expense of farmland heterogeneity. We assessed the relative merits of the two strategies in the context of preserving dung beetle PD in twenty 1-km 2 livestock landscapes in a Neotropical biodiversity hotspot. We calculated six complementary metrics of PD: phylogenetic richness ( 0 D ( T )), divergence ( 2 D ( T ), MPD and MNTD) and structure (NRI and NTI). Dung beetle density varied irrespective of forest cover, cattle yield and farmland heterogeneity, but phylogenetic richness and divergence decreased in more deforested landscapes, resulting in reduced phylogenetic dispersion closer to the tips (i.e. higher relatedness within genera). Similarly, increased net cattle yield resulted in reduced phylogenetic richness and divergence (except MNTD), but had a weaker effect on phylogenetic structure. While farmland heterogeneity had no significant effect on phylogenetic metrics, model selection indicated that forest cover was more important than livestock intensification in determining dung beetle PD. To avoid losing evolutionary lineages of dung beetles and increase cattle yield, we recommend implementing land sparing in the region by concentrating cattle production—i.e. producing the same yield on a smaller area of land through intensification—to set aside more land for forest conservation.