EASIX in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective cohort analysis. Issue 9 (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luft, Thomas; Benner, Axel; Jodele, Sonata; Dandoy, Christopher E; Storb, Rainer; Gooley, Ted; Sandmaier, Brenda M; Becker, Natalia; Radujkovic, Aleksandar; Dreger, Peter; Penack, Olaf
• Is Part Of: Lancet. Volume 4:Issue 9(2017)
• Page Start: e414
• Page End: e423
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.15005
• DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30108-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-3026

Abstract

Summary: Background: Endothelial dysfunction links thrombotic microangiopathy to steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. We aimed to assess if the simple formula—lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)/thrombocytes (10 9 cells per L)—termed the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), might be valuable for the prediction of death in patients with acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Methods: For this retrospective analysis, we analysed a training cohort (in Germany) and three validation cohorts (in Germany and the USA) of patients with acute GVHD who had received consecutive allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary endpoint was prediction of overall survival when measured at acute GVHD onset (EASIX-GVHD). We validated the prognostic strength of EASIX-GVHD for overall survival and non-relapse mortality in the three independent cohorts by calculating the prediction error (integrated Brier score), and concordance index. Findings: In the total cohort of patients with acute GVHD (n=311), EASIX-GVHD predicted overall survival in univariable and multivariable models (univariate analysis, hazard ratio [HR] for a one-fold increase 1·16, 95% CI 1·12–1·20, p=0·0004). However, in the subpopulation of patients with myeloablative conditioning (n=72), EASIX-GVHD did not predict overall survival, which is probably attributable to thrombocytopenia at GVHD onset (73 × 10 9 cells per L [IQR 29·75–180·00] for myeloablative conditioning vs 160 × 10 9 cells per L [90·0–250·5] for reduced-intensity conditioning; p<0·0001). In patients who received reduced-intensity conditioning (n=239), EASIX-GVHD was a strong predictor of overall survival (HR for a two-fold change of 1·23, 95% CI 1·13–1·34; p<0·0001) and non-relapse mortality (cause-specific HR for a two-fold change of 1·24, 1·12–1·38; p<0·0001). Model validation for prediction of overall survival and non-relapse mortality by EASIX-GVHD was successful in two independent cohorts of adult patients with reduced-intensity conditioning (n=141, n=173) and in a cohort with mainly paediatric patients (n=89). Interpretation: In patients with reduced-intensity conditioning, EASIX-GVHD is a powerful predictor of survival after GVHD. EASIX-GVHD could be the future basis for development of risk-adapted GVHD treatment strategies. Funding: There was no external funding source for this study.