The Australian Historic Shipwreck Preservation Project: In situ Preservation and Long-Term Monitoring of the Clarence (1850) and James Matthews (1841) Shipwreck Sites. (2nd July 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Australian Historic Shipwreck Preservation Project: In situ Preservation and Long-Term Monitoring of the Clarence (1850) and James Matthews (1841) Shipwreck Sites. (2nd July 2016)
- Main Title:
- The Australian Historic Shipwreck Preservation Project: In situ Preservation and Long-Term Monitoring of the Clarence (1850) and James Matthews (1841) Shipwreck Sites
- Authors:
- Richards, Vicki
MacLeod, Ian
Veth, Peter - Abstract:
- Abstract : Increasingly, archaeologists are opting for on-site examination, reinterment, and in situ preservation of underwater cultural heritage sites as the first option in the management of sites at risk, as opposed to the more traditional excavation, recovery, conservation, and display/storage methods. This decision will inevitably be based on significance assessment, degree of perceived risk, and resourcing issues. However, long-term monitoring must become an integral part of these management programmes in order to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the in situ preservation techniques employed. In 2012 the Australian Historic Shipwreck Preservation Project (AHSPP) was awarded a large Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Grant, enabling ten partner organizations and three Australian universities to collaborate in one of the largest multi-organizational maritime archaeology projects to be undertaken in Australia to date. One of the major aims of the project is to develop a protocol for the excavation, detailed recording and reburial of significant shipwrecks under threat, fostering a strategic national approach for the management of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) sites at risk. Two historically significant shipwreck sites that are considered under threat were chosen for this longitudinal comparative study — the Clarence (1850) located in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria; and the James Matthews (1841) which lies in Cockburn Sound, Western Australia. Both sitesAbstract : Increasingly, archaeologists are opting for on-site examination, reinterment, and in situ preservation of underwater cultural heritage sites as the first option in the management of sites at risk, as opposed to the more traditional excavation, recovery, conservation, and display/storage methods. This decision will inevitably be based on significance assessment, degree of perceived risk, and resourcing issues. However, long-term monitoring must become an integral part of these management programmes in order to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the in situ preservation techniques employed. In 2012 the Australian Historic Shipwreck Preservation Project (AHSPP) was awarded a large Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Grant, enabling ten partner organizations and three Australian universities to collaborate in one of the largest multi-organizational maritime archaeology projects to be undertaken in Australia to date. One of the major aims of the project is to develop a protocol for the excavation, detailed recording and reburial of significant shipwrecks under threat, fostering a strategic national approach for the management of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) sites at risk. Two historically significant shipwreck sites that are considered under threat were chosen for this longitudinal comparative study — the Clarence (1850) located in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria; and the James Matthews (1841) which lies in Cockburn Sound, Western Australia. Both sites have been preserved in situ using two very different but innovative remediation strategies. More importantly, long-term monitoring programmes have been implemented on both sites, which will characterize changes in the reburial environment and the effect on the reinterred materials. In this way, the efficacy of both in situ preservation techniques will be systematically tested, providing a comparative analysis of practical protocols for the long-term protection and management of underwater cultural heritage. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Conservation and management of archaeological sites. Volume 18:Number 1/3(2016)
- Journal:
- Conservation and management of archaeological sites
- Issue:
- Volume 18:Number 1/3(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 18, Issue 1/3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 1/3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0018-NaN-0000
- Page Start:
- 240
- Page End:
- 253
- Publication Date:
- 2016-07-02
- Subjects:
- in situ preservation -- underwater cultural heritage -- shipwrecks -- monitoring -- conservation management
Excavations (Archaeology) -- Collection and protection -- Periodicals
Cultural property -- Protection -- Periodicals
Historic buildings -- Conservation and restoration -- Periodicals
Historic sites -- Conservation and restoration -- Periodicals
Antiquities -- Collection and preservation -- Periodicals
930.1028 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/cma ↗
http://maneypublishing.com/ ↗
http://www.earthscan.co.uk/defaultCMAS.asp?sp=&v=6 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/13505033.2016.1182759 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1350-5033
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - Digital Store - Ingest File:
- 11125.xml