Secondary use of electronic health records: Availability aspects in two Nordic countries. Issue 3 (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vikström, Antti; Moen, Hans; Moosavi, Sanaz Rahimi; Salakoski, Tapio; Salanterä, Sanna
• Is Part Of: Health information management journal. Volume 48:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 144
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: electronic health records -- health information management -- patient data privacy -- secondary use -- open access; Medical records -- Management -- Periodicals; Medical records -- Management -- Australia -- Periodicals; Medical records -- Management; Australia; Periodicals; Periodicals; 651.50426105
• DOI: 10.1177/1833358318817473
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1833-3583

Abstract

Background: The potential for the secondary use of electronic health records (EHRs) is underused due to restrictions in national legislation. For privacy purposes, legislative restrictions limit the availability and content of EHR data provided to secondary users. These limitations do not encourage healthcare organisations to develop procedures to promote the secondary use of EHRs. Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors that restrict the secondary use of unstructured EHRs in academic research in Finland and Sweden. Method: A study was conducted to identify these availability-restricting issues that pertain to the academic secondary use of unstructured EHRs. Using semi-structured interviews, 14 domain experts in science, hospital management and business were interviewed to evaluate the efficiency of procedures and technologies that are implemented in secondary use processes. Results: The results demonstrate three aspects that restrict the availability of unstructured EHRs for secondary purposes: (i) the management and (ii) privacy preservation of such data as well as (iii) potential secondary users. Conclusion: Based on these categories, two approaches for the secondary use of unstructured EHRs are identified: the protected processing environment and altered data. Implications: The protected processing environment ensures patient privacy by providing unstructured EHRs for exclusive user groups that have preferred use intentions. Compared to the use of such processing environments, data alteration enables the secondary use of unstructured EHRs for a larger user group with various use intentions but that yield less valuable content.