Prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes: a propensity matched substudy of RENAMI. Issue 6 (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes: a propensity matched substudy of RENAMI. Issue 6 (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes: a propensity matched substudy of RENAMI
- Authors:
- Conrotto, Federico
Bertaina, Maurizio
Raposeiras-Roubin, Sergio
Kinnaird, Tim
Ariza-Solé, Albert
Manzano-Fernández, Sergio
Templin, Christian
Velicki, Lazar
Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
Cerrato, Enrico
Rognoni, Andrea
Boccuzzi, Giacomo
Omedè, Pierluigi
Montabone, Andrea
Taha, Salma
Durante, Alessandro
Gili, Sebastiano
Magnani, Giulia
Autelli, Michele
Grosso, Alberto
Flores Blanco, Pedro
Garay, Alberto
Quadri, Giorgio
Varbella, Ferdinando
Caneiro Queija, Berenice
Cobas Paz, Rafael
Cespón Fernández, María
Muñoz Pousa, Isabel
Gallo, Diego
Morbiducci, Umberto
Dominguez-Rodriguez, Alberto
Valdés, Mariano
Cequier, Angel
Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
Iñiguez-Romo, Andrés
Gaita, Fiorenzo
Abu-Assi, Emad
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
… (more) - Abstract:
- Introduction: The safety and efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting with acute coronary syndrome and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention remain to be assessed. Methods: All diabetes patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome and enrolled in the REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) were compared before and after propensity score matching. Net adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and BARC 3–5 bleedings) and major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, stroke and myocardial infarction) were the co-primary endpoints. Single components of primary endpoints were secondary endpoints. Results: Among 4424 patients enrolled in RENAMI, 462 and 862 diabetes patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively, were considered. After propensity score matching, 386 patients from each group were selected. At 19±5 months, major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse cardiovascular events were similar in the prasugrel and ticagrelor groups (5.4% vs. 3.4%, P =0.16 and 6.7% vs. 4.1%, P =0.11, respectively). Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of death and BARC 2–5 bleeding when compared to prasugrel (2.8% vs. 0.8%, P =0.031 and 6.0% vs. 2.6%, P =0.02, respectively) and a clear but not significant trend for a reduction of BARC 3–5 bleeding (2.3% vs. 0.8%, P =0.08). There were no significant differences in myocardialIntroduction: The safety and efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting with acute coronary syndrome and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention remain to be assessed. Methods: All diabetes patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome and enrolled in the REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) were compared before and after propensity score matching. Net adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and BARC 3–5 bleedings) and major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, stroke and myocardial infarction) were the co-primary endpoints. Single components of primary endpoints were secondary endpoints. Results: Among 4424 patients enrolled in RENAMI, 462 and 862 diabetes patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively, were considered. After propensity score matching, 386 patients from each group were selected. At 19±5 months, major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse cardiovascular events were similar in the prasugrel and ticagrelor groups (5.4% vs. 3.4%, P =0.16 and 6.7% vs. 4.1%, P =0.11, respectively). Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of death and BARC 2–5 bleeding when compared to prasugrel (2.8% vs. 0.8%, P =0.031 and 6.0% vs. 2.6%, P =0.02, respectively) and a clear but not significant trend for a reduction of BARC 3–5 bleeding (2.3% vs. 0.8%, P =0.08). There were no significant differences in myocardial infarction recurrence and stent thrombosis. Conclusion: Diabetes patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome seem to benefit equally in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events from ticagrelor or prasugrel use. Ticagrelor was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause death and bleedings, without differences in recurrent ischaemic events, which should be confirmed in dedicated randomised controlled trials. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European heart journal. Volume 8:Issue 6(2019)
- Journal:
- European heart journal
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Issue 6(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 6 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0008-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 536
- Page End:
- 542
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- Acute coronary syndrome -- diabetes mellitus -- dual antiplatelet therapy -- prasugrel -- ticagrelor
616.1205 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/issue ↗
http://acc.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2048872618802783 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2048-8726
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11107.xml