Three-electron spin qubits. (24th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Russ, Maximilian; Burkard, Guido
• Is Part Of: Journal of physics. Volume 29:Number 39(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-08-24
• Subjects: qubits -- spin qubits -- exchange-only qubits -- resonant exchange qubits -- RX qubit -- charge noise -- cavity QED; Condensed matter -- Periodicals; Matière condensée -- Périodiques; Vaste stoffen; Vloeistoffen; Natuurkunde; Electronic journals; Computer network resources; 530.4105
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa761f
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0953-8984

Abstract

Abstract: The goal of this article is to review the progress of three-electron spin qubits from their inception to the state of the art. We direct the main focus towards the exchange-only qubit (Bacon et al 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett .85 1758–61, DiVincenzo et al 2000 Nature 408 339) and its derived versions, e.g. the resonant exchange (RX) qubit, but we also discuss other qubit implementations using three electron spins. For each three-spin qubit we describe the qubit model, the envisioned physical realization, the implementations of single-qubit operations, as well as the read-out and initialization schemes. Two-qubit gates and decoherence properties are discussed for the RX qubit and the exchange-only qubit, thereby completing the list of requirements for quantum computation for a viable candidate qubit implementation. We start by describing the full system of three electrons in a triple quantum dot, then discuss the charge-stability diagram, restricting ourselves to the relevant subsystem, introduce the qubit states, and discuss important transitions to other charge states (Russ et al 2016 Phys. Rev . B94 165411). Introducing the various qubit implementations, we begin with the exchange-only qubit (DiVincenzo et al 2000 Nature 408 339, Laird et al 2010 Phys. Rev . B82 075403), followed by the RX qubit (Medford et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett .111 050501, Taylor et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett .111 050502), the spin-charge qubit (Kyriakidis and Burkard 2007 Phys. Rev . B75 115324), and the hybrid qubit (Shi et al 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett .108 140503, Koh et al 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett .109 250503, Cao et al 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett .116 086801, Thorgrimsson et al 2016 arXiv:1611.04945). The main focus will be on the exchange-only qubit and its modification, the RX qubit, whose single-qubit operations are realized by driving the qubit at its resonant frequency in the microwave range similar to electron spin resonance. Two different types of two-qubit operations are presented for the exchange-only qubits which can be divided into short-ranged and long-ranged interactions. Both of these interaction types are expected to be necessary in a large-scale quantum computer. The short-ranged interactions use the exchange coupling by placing qubits next to each other and applying exchange-pulses (DiVincenzo et al 2000 Nature 408 339, Fong and Wandzura 2011 Quantum Inf. Comput .11 1003, Setiawan et al 2014 Phys. Rev . B89 085314, Zeuch et al 2014 Phys. Rev . B90 045306, Doherty and Wardrop 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett .111 050503, Shim and Tahan 2016 Phys. Rev . B93 121410), while the long-ranged interactions use the photons of a superconducting microwave cavity as a mediator in order to couple two qubits over long distances (Russ and Burkard 2015 Phys. Rev . B92 205412, Srinivasa et al 2016 Phys. Rev . B94 205421). The nature of the three-electron qubit states each having the same total spin and total spin in z -direction (same Zeeman energy) provides a natural protection against several sources of noise (DiVincenzo et al 2000 Nature 408 339, Taylor et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett .111 050502, Kempe et al 2001 Phys. Rev . A63 042307, Russ and Burkard 2015 Phys. Rev . B91 235411). The price to pay for this advantage is an increase in gate complexity. We also take into account the decoherence of the qubit through the influence of magnetic noise (Ladd 2012 Phys. Rev . B86 125408, Mehl and DiVincenzo 2013 Phys. Rev . B87 195309, Hung et al 2014 Phys. Rev . B90 045308), in particular dephasing due to the presence of nuclear spins, as well as dephasing due to charge noise (Medford et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett .111 050501, Taylor et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett .111 050502, Shim and Tahan 2016 Phys. Rev . B93 121410, Russ and Burkard 2015 Phys. Rev . B91 235411, Fei et al 2015 Phys. Rev . B91 205434), fluctuations of the energy levels on each dot due to noisy gate voltages or the environment. Several techniques are discussed which partly decouple the qubit from magnetic noise (Setiawan et al 2014 Phys. Rev . B89 085314, West and Fong 2012 New J. Phys .14 083002, Rohling and Burkard 2016 Phys. Rev . B93 205434) while for charge noise it is shown that it is favorable to operate the qubit on the so-called '(double) sweet spots' (Taylor et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett .111 050502, Shim and Tahan 2016 Phys. Rev . B93 121410, Russ and Burkard 2015 Phys. Rev . B91 235411, Fei et al 2015 Phys. Rev . B91 205434, Malinowski et al 2017 arXiv: 1704.01298), which are least susceptible to noise, thus providing a longer lifetime of the qubit.