Robust and practical non-invasive estimation of local arterial wave speed and mean blood velocity waveforms. (1st November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kowalski, Remi; Beare, Richard; Willemet, Marie; Alastruey, Jordi; Smolich, Joseph J; Cheung, Michael M H; Mynard, Jonathan P
• Is Part Of: Physiological measurement. Volume 38:Number 11(2017:Nov.)
• Page Start: 2081
• Page End: 2099
• Publication Date: 2017-11-01
• Subjects: pulse wave velocity -- wave analysis -- ultrasound -- Doppler -- wave speed -- blood flow; Physiology -- Measurement -- Periodicals; Patient monitoring -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa8de3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-3334

Abstract

Abstract: Objective : Local arterial wave speed, a surrogate of vessel stiffness, can be estimated via the pressure-velocity ( PU ) and diameter-velocity (ln( D ) U ) loop methods. These assume negligible early-systolic reflected waves (RWes) and require measurement of cross-sectionally averaged velocity ( U mean ), which is related to volumetric blood flow. However, RWes may not always be negligible and Doppler ultrasound typically provides maximum velocity waveforms or estimates of mean velocity subject to various errors ( U raw ). This study investigates how these issues affect wave speed estimation and explores more robust methods for obtaining local wave speed and U mean . Approach : Using aortic phase-contrast MRI (PCMRI, n = 34) and a simulated virtual cohort ( n = 3325), we assessed errors in calculated wave speed caused by RWes and use of U raw rather than true U mean . By combining PU raw and ln( D ) U raw loop wave speed values, (i) a corrected wave speed (ln( D ) P ), insensitive to RWes and velocity errors, was derived; and (ii) a novel method for estimating U mean from U raw was proposed (where U raw can be any scaled version of U mean ). Main results : Proof-of-principle was established via PCMRI data and in the ascending aorta, carotid, brachial and femoral arteries of the virtual cohort, with acceptably low wave speed and U mean errors obtained even when local pressure was estimated from diameter and mean/diastolic brachial pressures. Significance : Given a locally measured diameter waveform and brachial cuff pressures, (i) the velocity- and RWes-independent ln( D ) P method can be applied non-invasively and is likely more robust than ln( D ) U and PU loop methods; and (ii) U mean can be estimated from routinely-acquired U raw .