The influence of numerical error on parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification for advective PDE models. (29th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nardini, John T; Bortz, D M
• Is Part Of: Inverse problems. Volume 35:Number 6(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-05-29
• Subjects: inverse problems -- numerical analysis -- uncertainty quantification -- autocorrelation; Inverse problems (Differential equations) -- Periodicals; 515.357
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/ab10bb
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-5611

Abstract

Abstract: Advective partial differential equations can be used to describe many scientific processes. Two significant sources of error that can cause difficulties in inferring parameters from experimental data on these processes include (i) noise from the measurement and collection of experimental data and (ii) numerical error in approximating the forward solution to the advection equation. How this second source of error alters parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification during an inverse problem methodology is not well understood. As a step towards a better understanding of this problem, we present both analytical and computational results concerning how a least squares cost function and parameter estimator behave in the presence of numerical error in approximating solutions to the underlying advection equation. We investigate residual patterns to derive an autocorrelative statistical model that can improve parameter estimation and confidence interval computation for first order methods. Building on our results and their general nature, we provide guidelines for practitioners to determine when numerical or experimental error is the main source of error in their inference, along with suggestions of how to efficiently improve their results.