Trial latencies estimation of event-related potentials in EEG by means of genetic algorithms. (1st February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Da Pelo, P; De Tommaso, M; Monaco, A; Stramaglia, S; Bellotti, R; Tangaro, S
• Is Part Of: Journal of neural engineering. Volume 15:Number 2(2018:Apr.)
• Publication Date: 2018-02-01
• Subjects: EEG -- ERP -- P300 -- single-trial -- latency -- genetic algorithm -- intra-subject variability; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa9b97
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1741-2560

Abstract

Abstract: Objective . Event-related potentials (ERPs) are usually obtained by averaging thus neglecting the trial-to-trial latency variability in cognitive electroencephalography (EEG) responses. As a consequence the shape and the peak amplitude of the averaged ERP are smeared and reduced, respectively, when the single-trial latencies show a relevant variability. To date, the majority of the methodologies for single-trial latencies inference are iterative schemes providing suboptimal solutions, the most commonly used being the Woody's algorithm. Approach . In this study, a global approach is developed by introducing a fitness function whose global maximum corresponds to the set of latencies which renders the trial signals most aligned as possible. A suitable genetic algorithm has been implemented to solve the optimization problem, characterized by new genetic operators tailored to the present problem. Main results . The results, on simulated trials, showed that the proposed algorithm performs better than Woody's algorithm in all conditions, at the cost of an increased computational complexity (justified by the improved quality of the solution). Application of the proposed approach on real data trials, resulted in an increased correlation between latencies and reaction times w.r.t. the output from RIDE method. Significance . The above mentioned results on simulated and real data indicate that the proposed method, providing a better estimate of single-trial latencies, will open the way to more accurate study of neural responses as well as to the issue of relating the variability of latencies to the proper cognitive and behavioural correlates.