How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction. (26th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ferretti, Alice; Chondrogiannis, Sotirios; Rampin, Lucia; Bellan, Elena; Marzola, Maria Cristina; Grassetto, Gaia; Gusella, Stella; Maffione, Anna Margherita; Gava, Marcello; Rubello, Domenico
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 63:Number 23(2018:Dec.)
• Publication Date: 2018-11-26
• Subjects: SUV harmonization -- PET/CT scanners -- PSF -- EQ.filter -- EARL accreditation program; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaee27
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: State of the art point-spread function (PSF) corrections implemented in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) reconstruction improved image quality and diagnostic performance but caused an increase in the standardized uptake value (SUV) compared to a conventional OSEM reconstruction system. The EANM suggested one produce two reconstructions, one optimised for maximum lesion detection and one for semi-quantitative analysis. In this work we investigated an alternative methodology, using a single reconstruction data set together with a post-reconstruction algorithm for SUV harmonization. Data acquisition was performed on a Siemens Biograph mCT system equipped with lutetium oxyorthosilicat crystals, PSF and time-of-flight algorithms and on a General Electric Discovery STE system equipped with BGO crystals. Both a EANM double reconstruction method and a dedicated post-reconstruction algorithm (marketed as EQ-filter) were tested to harmonize the quantitative values of the two PET/CT scanners. For phantom measurements we used a NEMA IQ phantom and a Jaszczak cylindrical phantom equipped with small spheres (lesion to background ratios of 8:1 and 4:1). Several different reconstruction settings were tested in order to provide a general methodology. Data obtained by phantom measurements were validated on seven oncologic patients who performed a one-bed extra acquisition on a different scanner. The evaluation regarded 39 small lesions (diameters: 0.3–2.6 cm) and was performed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The SUV recoveries measured with the PSF reconstruction exceeded those obtained by the OSEM reconstruction with deviations ranging from 16% to 150%. These discrepancies resulted below 7% applying the optimized value of the EQ.filter or the double-reconstruction methods. For each reconstruction setting the optimal value of the EQ.filter was identified in order to minimize these discrepancies. Patient data, analyzed by Wilcoxon statistical test, confirmed and validated phantom measurements. EQ.filter can harmonize SUV values between different PET/CT scanners using a single reconstruction optimized to maximum lesion detectability. In this way, the second reconstruction proposed by EANM/EARL is avoided.