A Case Study of Chinese Netizens' Opinions on Capital Punishment: Diversity, Rationale, and Interaction. (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Jianhong; Liang, Bin
• Is Part Of: Modern China. Volume 45:Number 6(2019:Nov.)
• Page Start: 666
• Page End: 692
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: netizens' opinions on capital punishment -- Lin Senhao case -- diversity of public opinion -- rationales for capital punishment -- netizens' interactions; China -- Periodicals; Chine; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 951.05
• DOI: 10.1177/0097700418819833
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0097-7004

Abstract

Empirical studies of Chinese public opinion on capital punishment are very rare. Almost all past studies suffered from questionable survey designs and/or nonrepresentative/nonrandom sampling (e.g., student samples). In this study, to examine the breadth and the depth of public opinion on capital punishment, we turn to Chinese netizens' opinions online on a particular capital case, the Lin Senhao poisoning case. Though our netizen sample has its own limitations, it is innovative and encompasses a broader group of representations than in past studies. Specifically, we address three questions: the diversity of netizens' opinions, the rationales for netizens' support for Lin's death sentence, and netizens' interactions. This study is the first to examine Chinese netizens' opinions in a capital case in detail and to uncover potential complexities and nuances of such opinions.