Correction of patient motion in cone-beam CT using 3D–2D registration. (9th November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ouadah, S; Jacobson, M; Stayman, J W; Ehtiati, T; Weiss, C; Siewerdsen, J H
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 62:Number 23(2017:Dec.)
• Page Start: 8813
• Page End: 8831
• Publication Date: 2017-11-09
• Subjects: 3D–2D registration -- C-arm -- cone-beam CT -- image-guided interventions -- motion correction -- image quality -- motion artifact; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9254
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: Cone-beam CT (CBCT) is increasingly common in guidance of interventional procedures, but can be subject to artifacts arising from patient motion during fairly long (~5–60 s) scan times. We present a fiducial-free method to mitigate motion artifacts using 3D–2D image registration that simultaneously corrects residual errors in the intrinsic and extrinsic parameters of geometric calibration. The 3D–2D registration process registers each projection to a prior 3D image by maximizing gradient orientation using the covariance matrix adaptation-evolution strategy optimizer. The resulting rigid transforms are applied to the system projection matrices, and a 3D image is reconstructed via model-based iterative reconstruction. Phantom experiments were conducted using a Zeego robotic C-arm to image a head phantom undergoing 5–15 cm translations and 5–15° rotations. To further test the algorithm, clinical images were acquired with a CBCT head scanner in which long scan times were susceptible to significant patient motion. CBCT images were reconstructed using a penalized likelihood objective function. For phantom studies the structural similarity (SSIM) between motion-free and motion-corrected images was >0.995, with significant improvement ( p < 0.001) compared to the SSIM values of uncorrected images. Additionally, motion-corrected images exhibited a point-spread function with full-width at half maximum comparable to that of the motion-free reference image. Qualitative comparison of the motion-corrupted and motion-corrected clinical images demonstrated a significant improvement in image quality after motion correction. This indicates that the 3D–2D registration method could provide a useful approach to motion artifact correction under assumptions of local rigidity, as in the head, pelvis, and extremities. The method is highly parallelizable, and the automatic correction of residual geometric calibration errors provides added benefit that could be valuable in routine use.